New Search
HAMLIN Pe D <br /> From: WEIXELMAN Susan E <br /> . Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 12:46 PM <br /> To: NOBLE Bob P; NIELSEN Betty L; Trina. Froehlich (E-mail) <br /> Cc:. DIXON Valerie A; HAMLIN Peggy D <br /> Subject: Airport - SB#3 <br /> <br /> ` ~ Importance: High <br /> .1 <br /> Hi All -this note is to follow up on the possible supplemental budget for the Airport for both the additional amount for the <br /> TSA improvements and to fix the negative balance available in Fund 512 (Capital). <br /> I discussed this further with Valerie today and based on that discussion I would like to propose to not do a supplemental <br /> budget for either of these items. First of all, we have enough appropriation authority that we can move via a budget journal <br /> j to cover the additional expenses for the TSA improvements. Additionally, we do not have to "fix" the negative balance <br /> available in Fund 512 if we choose not to. Since the Airport funds all get combined into one reporting fund we are not in a <br /> position where we have to move appropriation back into balance available. Essentially we can "fix" this at capital project <br /> rollover'time during supplemental budget #1 in FY04. Given the additional scrutiny the Airport has been in with the <br /> Council/Budget Committee lately, it is my recommendation that we not flag these items during the FY03 supplemental <br /> budget process. <br /> Please let me know if you have any concerns or questions on this. <br /> Thanks! <br /> Susan <br /> i <br /> c <br /> r <br /> I <br /> 7 <br /> i <br /> i <br /> f( <br /> 1 <br /> I <br /> i <br /> I <br /> f <br /> !i(j <br /> f <br /> I <br /> t <br /> I <br /> 7 <br /> i <br /> I <br /> t <br /> I <br /> 1 l <br /> i <br /> <br />