New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
98 Local Agency Audit of Hwy Trust Funds
COE
>
PW
>
Admin
>
Finance
>
Operating
>
2008
>
98 Local Agency Audit of Hwy Trust Funds
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2009 11:09:24 AM
Creation date
12/4/2008 1:35:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Operating
PW_Document_Type_ Operating
Reports
PW_Division
Administration
GL_Fund
131
GL_ORG
8990
Identification_Number
Local Agency Audit
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Local Agencies' Use of Highway Funds <br /> Performance Audit <br /> INTRODUCTION ~ - <br /> -Talbot, Korvola & Warwick, ~~P (TK1N) and its subcontractor Coopers & Lybrand, LLP., <br /> under, contract - to .the ~ Oregon Secretary of State Audits -Division, conducted a <br /> performance audit of Local Agencies Use of State Highway Funds. This report outlines <br /> - <br /> findings and recommendations based on our work. <br /> <br /> i <br /> EXECUTIVE .SUMMARY , _ _ , . - _ <br /> The purpose of.this,audit is to provide the Oregon Legislative Assembly, governor,-local <br /> . - <br /> agency officials and the public with-summary information on local agencies" ,use of <br /> State Highway Fund monies received under ORS 366.524. To provide this, information <br /> the Secretary of State Audits Division in conjunction with TKW selected 10 counties and <br /> 15 cities for this audit. - ~ ~ - <br /> _ _ - <br /> Our audit procedures were designed to meet the following objectives: - <br /> _ 1. Test the adequacy of intemal control over State Highway Fund monies. <br /> 2. Test compliance with expenditure restrictions enumerated in the Oregon <br /> Constitution and state statues. ~ - - <br /> 3. Determine how Oregon cities and counties used State Highway Fund monies. <br /> 4. Determine the amount and proportion of State Highway Fund monies used <br /> for administrative and indirect (overhead) expenses. <br /> 5. Develop specific recommendations. - <br /> We found the intemal contro( systems established and maintained by these counties <br /> and cities were adequate to properly safeguard, record and report on monies received <br /> i <br /> and expended. We also found that counties and cities had substantially complied with <br /> statutory restrictions for the expenditure of State Highway Fund monies. <br /> Perhaps the key ftnding of our engagement was that cities and counties in the state <br /> tend to commingle State Highway Fund monies with monies from a variety of other <br /> Talbot, Korvo/a ~ Warwick, u~ 1 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.