John Lattimer <br /> August 28, 1998 <br /> _ Page 3 - . , - ~ _ . _ . <br /> - We do not believe this is a necessary requirement. To implement this recommendation <br /> would require a major change to the chart of accounts of jurisdictions for no beneficial <br /> reason.` This recommendation also conflicts with the recommendation for commingling of <br /> funds. Reference is made to ORS 368.705 (2) which says the general road-fund _ ~ ' <br /> mentioned in sub-section (1) of this section shall be used: <br /> (a) In establishing, laying out, opening, surveying, altering, improving, constructing, <br /> ~ ~ maintaining and repairing county roads and bridges on county'roads; or _ ^ . , _ <br /> (b) _ <br /> <br /> ~ .r <br /> Additionally reference is made to Article IX Section 3a of the Oregon Constitution which <br /> provides the restrictions for using State Highway Funds exclusively for the construction,. <br /> reconstruction; im rovement, repair, maintenance, operation-.and use ,of public highways,- <br /> ' py.; <br /> roads, streets and roadside' rest areas in this 'state'and .further provides ui section"(2) (a) <br /> that-the State,Highway Funds may also be°used.for;the"cost of adm~nistrafion-and any <br /> refunds or credits authonzed by law ORS 294 055 in'part states that money~received <br /> from the Federal Govemment under the. Mineral Leasing Act shall be used =for the ~ <br /> _ - - <br /> 'construction and maintenance of ~publ~c roads ~n such ~count~es:~ ~~ORS 294.060 in' part <br /> ;r - states that the moneys;receNed by each county~from federal forest reserves shall be <br /> , <br /> divided 7b percent~to the_road .fund and, 25,percent to the school.fund of the county and, <br /> subject, toaubsections (2} and (3) of this section, the moneys shall be ezperided.as other <br /> moneys in those femds are:~expended. ~_ORS _294.065 states`that the moneys received from <br /> the Federal Government under'the Federal Flood Control act shall be used for the benefit of <br /> 'the public schools and public roads of the counties receiving the funds. ORS 272.085 <br /> says in part the funds received from the Federal Government as the funds from the five <br /> percent of proceeds of sales of public lands and materials on those lands shall be used for <br /> the benefit of the public roads and bridges of the recipient county. All of these funds as <br /> well as the State Highway Funds are used for the same purpose and we therefore do not <br /> 'see the necessity of specifically identifying the use of State Highway Funds. <br /> This recommendation also suggests an annual certification on use of State Highway <br /> Funds. ' As stated in the Overview of this audit OAR 162-10-295 requires the independent <br /> public accountant to comment in the annual audit report on compliance with Article IX, <br /> Section 3a of the Oregon Constitution pertaining to the use of monies from taxes on motor <br /> vehicle use fuel taxes and compliance with statutory requirements pertaining to the use of <br /> State Highway Fund monies. This additional certification is of no beneficial use and there <br /> is no need for duplication. _ <br /> D. Recommendation to Establish Administrative and Indirect (Overhead) Criterion. <br /> We agree with the first paragraph, particularly the statement that specific allocation <br /> percentages cannot be established and the reference to "reasonable". We agree that <br /> criteria and parameters (if they are different) should be established. The first step would <br /> be to agree on definitions for administration and indirect (overhead). In establishing criteria <br /> ;t <br /> for indirect costs reference could be made to guidelines of the Office of Management and <br /> Budget (OMB) covered in Circular A-87, Attachment A, "State and Local Indirect Cost Rate <br /> Proposals." Assistance in establishing criteria for administration may be available from <br /> other states accounting guidelines or from GAAP. <br /> 1 <br /> 's <br /> <br />