New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
COE Road Fund Efficiency Review
COE
>
PW
>
Admin
>
Finance
>
Operating
>
2009
>
COE Road Fund Efficiency Review
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2010 12:54:13 PM
Creation date
11/18/2008 12:49:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Operating
PW_Document_Type_ Operating
Reports
Fiscal_Year
2001
PW_Division
Maintenance
GL_Fund
131
GL_ORG
9410
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Urban Forestry <br /> Description of the function: <br /> Eugene has an extensive urban forestry program that supports the high value placed on <br /> flourishing trees in the city. Approximately $760,000 of the $1,043,000 is charged <br /> against the Road Fund for maintenance of street trees. <br /> Comparison to others: <br /> Each of the cities surveyed is designated as a Tree City USA. However, they all have <br /> different service level when it comes to street trees. Only Eugene, Sunnyvale and Salem <br /> have an active program of street tree pruning and only Eugene charges this effort against <br /> .the Road Fund. Boulder, Fort <br /> Collins and Vancouver do some s <br /> emergency tree pruning by Eugene $1,568 $85..20 <br /> contract but the Parks Department Vancouver. $0 <br /> does the bulk of their urban Sunnyvale $3,256 $67.47' <br /> Boulder $1,869 <br /> forestry work on public land. Fart Collins $o <br /> Safe?n $1,518 <br /> The chart shows how the cities <br /> compare by level of effort on a system wide/per mile basis. Only Sunnyvale has per tree <br /> expenditure information to compare for services like tree pruning, which constitutes a <br /> majority of program expenses. <br /> Cost Factor Analysis: <br /> Crew size vs. safety considerations has been an issue as it often is with forms of aerial <br /> work and other work in traffic. The current approach of varying crew size to <br /> accommodate the level of hazard is appropriate. <br /> Contracting Options: <br /> Tree pruning services are available and could do some of the work currently done by city <br /> crews. <br /> <br /> Efficiency Opportunities: <br /> • Examine the possibility of providing some tree pruning service by contract within the <br /> existing budget to account for the staffing vacancies that routinely occur. This will <br /> allow direct comparison of city crew costs against those of outside contractors. <br /> The cost of contract administration should not be forgotten, however, in analyzing <br /> these costs. <br /> 17 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.