Z <br />off people. He pointed out that one large chain store that sold gas would have people backed up <br />eight cars deep just because the gas there was a few cents cheaper per gallon than in other places. <br />He also felt that people in Florence who formerly went to Eugene to shop and purchase gas now <br />stayed home because the gas was cheaper there. He noted that the State had decided to require <br />that ethanol be combined with gasoline and this would result in a 30 percent reduction of <br />emissions. He said this was good for the State. He believed that the State would choose to <br />pursue a statewide remedy for transportation funding for the same reason. He underscored his <br />belief that a local gas tax only hurt local dealers. <br />Aaron Johnson, 2672 Canterbury Street, remarked that the City Council had an important <br />decision before it: to vote with the electors or to vote against them with "blatant disregard to <br />those who" elected them to office. He said it was up to the council to stand up and vote on behalf <br />the people of the City. He averred that the people needed the council's help to stop the "unfair <br />tax burden." He acknowledged that the roads were in a state of disrepair and that the 2 cent gas <br />tax might sound like a good idea. He believed, however, that it would cause problems "on further <br />issues." He felt that a statewide fee would cause all Oregonians to shoulder the burden equally. <br />He thought a local tax would continue to hurt the tax base. He questioned how the City could <br />hope to repair the "decaying downtown" if people stopped coming to Eugene for the goods and <br />services available there. He believed continuing "down this road" would hurt the people of <br />Eugene. He predicted the coming recession would add to the strain. He related that he had 24 <br />employees when the tax began and he now had 16. He added that several of the former <br />employees were now on government assistance while they pursued other employment. He <br />asserted that the City was forcing small station owners to sign long contracts with "big oil," thus <br />removing competition and causing prices to rise unchecked. He commented that one owner had <br />closed his stations and "walked away." <br />Howard Bonnett, 1835 East 28`h Avenue, suggested an alternative political strategy: extend the <br />tax for three more years in order to see if the State would pursue another mode of funding. He <br />said in the mean time the gas tax would provide another $3 million more for the roads that need <br />work. He invited anyone who drove elsewhere to buy cheaper gasoline to consider how much the <br />drive to purchase it costs. <br />Mayar Piercy closed the public hearing and opened the floor for councilor comments. <br />Councilar Ortiz commented that she did not look at the City of Eugene selling less gasoline as <br />necessarily a bad thing. She would surmise that people were living within their footprint. She <br />felt that spending money locally in one's own community was a good thing. She had supported <br />the gas tax in the past because she heard the frustration of staff regarding not being able to <br />address deteriorating roads and she heard feedback from constituents regarding the roads. <br />Councilor Pryor thought the vote in November was something the council should pay attention to. <br />He was uncertain as to how he would vote on it at this point. He recalled that he had debated the <br />last gas tax with Mr. Romain and he believed Mr. Romain was sincere when he said he would <br />work to pass a statewide gas tax. He indicated his willingness to work with Mr. Romain and <br />others on such a tax. He had some concern that continuing the 2 cent tax would result in a <br />situation where the council could find it voted down as the proposed tax on the November ballot <br />had been voted. He also found it difficult to walk away from $1.4 million, which he believed was <br />desperately needed. He wanted to have community support for the larger elements of the <br />transportation package the committee had worked on. He was concerned that the gas tax could <br />negatively impact a bond measure. He agreed that street repairs should not be a"sidebar issue" <br />when talking about the budget. <br />