New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Levy for Street Repairs
COE
>
PW
>
Admin
>
Execs
>
Executive non-confidential
>
Historical
>
Levy for Street Repairs
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/11/2010 9:58:42 AM
Creation date
10/10/2008 1:08:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Exec
PW_Division_Exec
Administration
PWA_Project_Area
Road Repair
PW_Subject
Tax levey for street repairs - survey attached
Document_Date
1/28/2008
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• '~ <br />• Preparation of the design and bid specifications for the project, including which sections are to <br />be overlaid or reconstructed, and to what extent other street components will be affected, such as <br />curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and traffic signals; <br />e Ensuring compliance with state contracting laws and rules, and monitoring the work of the <br />contractors to ensure the City receives the services and value for which it has contracted; <br />• Coordination of project timelines with other public and private sector partners, so as to minimize <br />the impact on neighboring businesses, residents and institutions. For example, with the <br />reconstruction of Hilyard., coordinating efforts took place with local business owners, 4J and the <br />University to minimize the project impacts on citizens; and <br />• Project coordination with utility partners, such as EWEB and Northwest Natural Gas, to help <br />ensure that all work in the City's road right of way is synchronized to minimize the number of <br />construction disruptions and to obtain cost efficiencies across all agency projects. <br />The proposed list of high profile projects included as Attachment A would be undertaken with bond <br />proceeds. Attachment B includes a map illustrating where these proposed projects would occur. The <br />cost of these high-profile projects, incTuding the costs of project design and management, will account <br />for an estimated one-third of the total bond spending over the 10-year period. <br />As recommended by the subcommittee and endorsed by council, $350,000 of the annual bond proceeds <br />would be dedicated for bike/pedestrian path capital preservation activities and would account for an <br />estimated 5% of bond spending over the 10-year period. In subsequent years, that earmarked amount <br />would increase by an inflation rate of 4.8%, along with the bond proceeds generated. <br />The remaining two-thirds of bond spending would not be allocated in the resolution to specific projects. <br />Instead, these funds could be spent on any pavement capital preservation treatments as defined in the <br />ballot measure language and determined by the City's pavement management system. <br />The resolution would also include a provision for a regular review by an independent auditor for the <br />purpose of issuing a report on the use of the bond proceeds. The auditor procedures would ascertain that <br />the bond proceeds were used for the purposes, and in compliance with the restrictions, set forth in the <br />ballot language. The auditor would furnish a written report to the council, which would also be made <br />publicly available. <br />Timing <br />The subcommittee recommended that the measure be placed on the May 20, 2008 ballot. Should the <br />council wish to proceed with this election date, a resolution placing the measure on the ballot should be <br />approved no later than February 18 to comply with the election time lines for the May election. The <br />council tentative agenda includes a meeting on February 11 to place the measure on the May ballot. <br />Once the council passes a resolution placing the measure on the ballot, the City Attorney will create a <br />ballot title (caption, question and summary), which will be published in the Register-Guard. Citizens <br />will have an opportunity to challenge the ballot language by filing a petition with the Lane County <br />Circuit Court within seven business days of the date that the city attorney files the ballot title with the <br />city recorder. If council acts to adopt the resolution not later than February 18, it'should allow enough <br />time for the Lane County Circuit Court to decide any ballot title challenge in time for the measure to be <br />placed on the May ballot. , <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.