From: Jerome LIDZ [mailto:Jerome.S.Lidz@harrang.com] <br />Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 11:07 AM <br />To: CARLSON Becky A <br />Cc: PETERSON Tish A <br />Subject: RE: Review, comment, input on draft AIS for gas tax action <br />Becky, <br />To me, those are sufficient reasons not to float the "credit" concept. <br />Jerry <br />THIS MESSAGE IS A CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNICATION UNDER THE ATTORNEY- <br />CLIENT OR ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT PRNILEGE. <br />»> "CARLSON Becky A" <becky.a.carlson@ci.eugene.or.us> 1/22/2008 10:59 AM »> <br />Jerry, I also think the "crediY' for city tax paid would pose some significant administrative difficulties, <br />because the dealers who remit the tax are not the ultimate payors of the tax--and we have no way to <br />identify and credit the individual retail purchasers of gas. If there is a law on the books to collect a city <br />gas tax, as well as the state taxes, I don't think dealers would have a choice other than to collect both <br />taxes at the retail levei--and that is where we run into difficulties trying to administer a"credit." This is the <br />same difficulty we contemplated when we considered the option of letting the 3-cent tax increase go into <br />effect upon passage by council, and then somehow try to "refund" the additional tax collected, if a <br />referendum to the ballot were successful. Tish, do you want to add any comments to this? ~becky <br />From: Jerome LIDZ [mailto:Jerome.S.Lidz@harrang.com] <br />Sent: Tuesday, ]anuary 22, 2008 10:36 AM <br />To: CARLSON Becky A <br />Subject: RE: Review, comment, input on draft AIS for gas tax action <br />Becky. <br />I see there is an editorial in today's RG, suggesting that the Council retain the two-cent portion <br />of the tax until the Governor signs a bill increasing the statewide tax. <br />At the public hearing last week, Councilor Bettman asked if the City could build that approach <br />into a repeal of the sunset by adopting an automatic repeal of the two-cent tax as soon as there <br />is an increase of the statewide gas tax. My answer was No, because the Council cannot make an <br />ordinance's effect turn on action by someone else -- i.e., delegate its law-making authority to the <br />legislature. However, it _might_ be possible to get to roughly the same result by providing for a <br />credit against the City tax for tax paid to the state. The difficulty with that approach is that (I <br />assume) we would not agree to a cent-for-cent set-off; in other words, we'd want a ten or twelve <br />cent increase in the state gas tax before we'd agree to give up our two cents. And we'd want <br />assurance that a specified portion of the state revenue would come back to the City. Those <br />factors would ma.ke the set-off or credit very difficult to draft. And, of course, a future Council <br />could always change whatever Council does now, so there's no way the Council can make a <br />formal guarantee that it would repeal the two cents if the Legislature acts. In short, I don't <br />recommend that approach, but in light of the RG editorial, I thought I should at least raise the <br />concept. <br />Jerry <br />