New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Metro Waterways Study
COE
>
PW
>
Admin
>
Execs
>
Executive non-confidential
>
Historical
>
Metro Waterways Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/11/2010 9:58:53 AM
Creation date
10/6/2008 3:42:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Exec
PW_Division_Exec
POS
PWA_Project_Area
Miscellaneous
PW_Subject
Executive Team meeting
Document_Date
3/18/2005
External_View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> . Cedar Creek Priority Planning Corridor.Responses <br /> Respondents were given the choice of providing input specific to Amazon Creek, Cedar Creek, or another specified <br /> waterway. The following responses are from those who selected Cedar Creek. <br /> 1. How familiar are you with the waterways in the Eugene-Springfield Metro area? Are you: very familiar, <br /> somewhat familiar, not very familiar, or not at all familiar with these waterways? <br /> ~ Very familiar 1 Not at all familiar ~ Somewhat familiar 4 Not very familiar Q Don't know <br /> 2. Do you rent or own property near any of these waterwaysT <br /> ~ No (if no, go to 3) 23 Yes (if yes, go to 2a) <br /> 2a. Have you had any problems with this property that you think are attributable to the <br /> waterway? <br /> 15 No (if no, go to 3) 16 Yes; if yes, go to 2b. <br /> 2b. What sort of problems have you had? <br /> • Transients camping Trespass <br /> • Well water quality Flooding <br /> 3. People may or may not benefit from the waterways running through the Metro area. Select one category <br /> for each type of benefit listed below, to indicate TO WHAT DEGREE the waterways in this area have <br /> benefited YOU. <br /> DEGREE OF BENEFIT RECEIVED <br /> Not at Very <br /> All Slight Moderate Large Large <br /> A high quality of life 2 2 5 9 ~ <br /> Recreational opportunities . 3 5 4 9 8 <br /> Scenic enjoyment 0 2 6 8 ~ <br /> Improved community services (police ~ 5 4 2 1 <br /> protection, roads) <br /> High property values 8 4 10 5 1 <br /> Employment ~ 5 3 1 2 <br /> Increased access to parks and hike/ 9,4 3 5 i4 3 <br /> bike trails <br /> Access to natural areas 4 2 6 4 11 <br /> Good access to entertainment ~1 2 7 6 2 <br /> Meeting people from other areas 8 ~ 6 3 3 <br /> Metro Waterways Study -Citizen Involvement Summary Report -March 2005 21 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.