This Plan has conducted the mitigation analysis for the entire study area and concatdes that the most <br /> effeeiive.~-ay to achieve no net lotis of wetl<,nd resources is to avoid impact: As. result, over 75% 01 <br /> the .1,307 wetland acres will be protected from impact thrau~,h acyuisition, comprehensive pl.rn <br /> dcsigrrations, zoning techniques and huffcrin~~ rctluircmcnt:. <br /> For the 288 wetland acres recommended for development, the Plan requires compensation to occur at <br /> a minimum ratio of 1.5 acres of replacement for each acre of impact. Compensation is targeted for areas <br /> where the prospects for success are the highest, most beneficial to the ecological landscape and.requ ire <br /> little, ifany, on-going maintenance. These areas are located on historic wetlands, disturbed agricultural <br /> wetlands and in areas adjacent to existing waterways. Enhancement and restoration, therefore, will be <br /> the primary methods for compensating for wetland losses. Mitigation efforts will concentrate on <br /> reestablishing historic wetland types and habitats that naturally occur in the area; while also creating <br /> opportunities for other wetland types such as marshes and ponds. ' <br /> The Plan approaches rogation in a comprehensive thinner where resulting efforts not only satisfy <br /> federal and state wetland law but achieve outer community needs and ohjectives such as providing <br /> additional flood control stortge, water quality .cnhanccment features, imhrovcd wildlife habitat anci <br /> educational and recreational needs. <br /> Mitigation and the Regional ~Ylitigation Bank Concept <br /> The Plan utilizes the wetland mitigation bank concept as the primary means for implementing the <br /> mitigation program. With this approach,. mitigation efforts arc: planned as a whole where t}~e most <br /> suitable sites are identified, acquired and restored in advance of wetland impact. This concept not only <br /> benefits the natural resource system by planning for the restoration of the Amazon Creek basin, but it <br /> also benefits the users of the bank -the development community. The bank. system performs the <br /> mitigation requirements for individual users where the details of compensation are preplanned, <br /> con$tructed and maintained by a public or private nonprofit agency. To satisfy individual impact <br /> requirements, users simply have to buy mitigation credits from the bank, thus eliminating uncertainty <br /> <br /> _ and saving valuable time and resources. Because the bank is planned and developed as a whole, the <br /> details of mitigation can be incorporated into the existing environment, resulting. in a more logical and <br /> natural system. The bank is proposed to have sufficient capacity to serve the mitigation needs of the West <br /> Eugene Wetland Study Area and tt~e community as a whole. <br /> Stormwater Management <br /> T'he City of Eugene will develop a comprehensive Stormwater Management Program thataddresses the <br /> issues of flood control, water quality and natural resource management. This program will include <br /> management of the west Eugene wetlands system and will focus on the interrelationships among these <br /> components of Eugene's waterways and associated wetlands. The City of Eugene Public Works <br /> Department will use fewer piped storm sewers and will manage the open channels in ways to better <br /> balance stormwater and flood needs with environmental and wildlife habitat needs. T'he efforts will help <br /> reduce pollution and will make the waterways more pleasant urban open spaces. <br /> • <br /> Page 4 -Appendix A <br /> MOA For Wcst Eugcnc ~Vctlands Mitigation Banking Program <br /> <br />