~ ' <br /> ChCA.PT,L.K FU C1IZ <br /> D,EVELOPM.~NT AND NIITIGAT'IU1V <br /> INTRODUCTION <br /> This element of the Plart acknowledges conditions where the community's need for econoriucdevelop- <br /> ment outweighs the benefits to protect certain wetland sites by making them available for development <br /> according to the mitigation provisions of this Plan. The Plan views the mitigation process as an <br /> opportunity to restore" and enhance wetland functions and values of the Amazon Creek basin, while <br /> allowing limited development on isolated, lower quality. wetlands and meeting the requirements ~of state <br /> and federal wetland law. <br /> The 288 wetland acres proposed for development were determined through a process that evaluated each <br /> ,wetland against a set of criteria which had the effect of identifying those wetlands that are isolated, low <br /> .quality and of limited functional value..The criteria used in evaluagng sites for possible developrr?ent <br /> aze contained in Appendix B. ~ <br /> In addition to evaluation by local experts, resource agencies. and community members, ~tf~e relative <br /> quality of the west Eugene wetlands was determined by the Wetland Evaluation 'Technique (WET)'. <br /> program, designed by Paul Adamus of the Environmental Protection Agency. The results of this. <br /> evaluation are contained in the Technical Report. <br /> The Plan proposes to use the mitigation process to achieve compliance with federal and state wetland <br /> law,.and to provide:a vision and program for incorporating all of the elements of this plan with other . <br /> related community objectives (flood control, water quality and wildlife habitat enhancement, recreation <br /> and education programs) so that a broader goal is achieved -the restoration of the Amazori Creek basin <br /> into a community asset. ~ " <br /> The basic concepts of the mitigation program aze: . . <br /> • Avoid and minimize impact to all wetland sites that meet the protection criteria contained in <br /> APpendix B. <br /> • Where impact is unavoidable, compensate for losses commensurate with the .level of impact <br /> giving. priority to establishing the basic. physical wetland parameters (water, topography, <br /> connectedness) that eventually results in full functioning and diverse wetland habitats. <br /> Establish a management.entity that will monitor, maintain'and enforce.the requirements of~flie <br /> mitigation program. <br /> " • ~ Where full functioning wetlandsaze to be impacted, in-kind replacement of significant functions <br /> .and values will be required. The overall mitigation program, however, will be guided by the <br /> .ecological characteristics ofthe regional landscape and not necessarily by specific case-by-case <br /> \ impacts. Fo><disturbed agricultural wetlands, mitigation requirements will be determined using <br /> historic wetland types. presumed to have existed prior to disturbance and the desired mix by the . <br /> public. Incentives will be provided to mitigate in advance of impact in the form of replacement <br /> ratios which are less than the ratios for compensating at the time of impact. " <br /> <br /> " . Page 1 -Appendix B <br /> MoA For West Eugenc Wetlands Mitigation [3anking Program " <br /> <br />