New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Wetlands
COE
>
PW
>
Admin
>
Execs
>
Executive non-confidential
>
2009
>
Wetlands
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/11/2010 10:00:17 AM
Creation date
10/2/2008 1:28:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Exec
PW_Division_Exec
POS
PWA_Project_Area
Development
PW_Subject
WEP
Document_Date
1/1/1995
External_View
No
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
258
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Section 6: Conclusion & Recommendations <br /> Budgeting Process <br /> The City's current budgeting practice treats the bank as a item for new, single year funding each <br /> year. This cautious approach was desirable when the bank was relatively new and Public Works <br /> managers wanted the opportunity to ensure the financial status of the bank was reexamined each <br /> year. This process is somewhat outdated since the bank program has matured and we now have <br /> several years of experience with bank operations and budgeting. Additionally, this process leaves <br /> an unnecessary cloud of uncertainty over the bank since the funding must be approved as a special <br /> item each year. <br /> Conversion of the fund to a baseline budget in the City system would be optimal and efficient. <br /> This will significantly reduce the staff time associated with formulating and requesting <br /> authorization to expend the bank funds. Managers will still have an opportunity to review the <br /> bank fund as they do other funds, and adjustments can be made through the normal processes for <br /> alterations to baseline budgets. <br /> Mitigation Credit Fee <br /> The cost of a mitigation credit was established in the mid-90's after only one major restoration. <br /> project was completed. This was a good attempt at the time to capture the majority of the costs <br /> associated with creating a credit. However, the cost did not include long term maintenance, <br /> planning, administration, or other logistical support needs such as vehicles for summer staff and <br /> phones and computers. We now have much better information regarding the cost of creating a <br /> mitigation credit and there are now many other mitigation banks operating around the nation that <br /> serve as useful comparisons. With that in mind, it appears that the current fee charged by the <br /> West Eugene Wetlands Mitigation Bank will not provide adequate revenue to sustain the fund as <br /> indicated by the 7 year projection model. <br /> Recommendations: <br /> 1.) Convert the Mitigation Bank Fund (536) to a Baseline Budget beginning in FY04. <br /> 2.) Increase the Credit Fee Price to $45,000 beginning July 1, 2002 and adjust for inflation <br /> each year thereafter on July 1 as calculated by the Consumer Price Index (CPIJ. This can be <br /> <br /> accomplished through administrative order by the Public Works Director. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.