New Search
n` <br />r <br />6 Other. <br />Local Applicability`. Describe how your program continues to be appropriate for local <br />conditions (climate, geology, hydrology, MS4 size, etc.). <br />DE Text: - - - - _ ~ <br />------- - ----------------- ------------ - -------- - ~ <br />. Is the BMP technicall~,feasible considering local soilsb geoqra~h~etc.? _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ :, \- <br />. Werere~resentativestakehoidersconsulted? __________________________________ <br />Local Applicabilitv Methodolog~v include anv of the followine: <br />1) How did vou determine vour stormwater desiQn standards includine infiltration rate ~--_ <br />requirements (local soil conditions rainfall, local streams, rivers anv TMDL'sl, etc.; <br />21 Did you address "hi~h risk" sites or activities within your jurisdiction?; <br />3) Do vou have sub-basin differentiation?; <br />4) Is your SWMP consistent with local ordinances and requirements?; <br />5) Is the public aware of impacts to local receivin~ waters?; <br />61 Do vou coordinate with the communitv on local level (e.g., Watershed Councils, etc.) <br />7) Other. <br />Program Resources: Describe how you continue to allocate program resources <br />appropriately (e.g., current ability to finance the program, capacity to perform operation and <br />maintenance, tax base, public acceptability). <br />~ <br />~,~e_ <br />~...+~ . ,t*s. .~. . .ew <br />~ <br />e~....d_t .. *7Fw a_. ...btal <br />DE Text: <br />. Will the cost of imalementing the BMP have a reasonable relationshi~ to the aollution control_ _~ ,- ~ <br />and flow benefits to be achieved? ~,....e_~ .*~. .~ ..d,~ <br />. Are there acceatable initial and long-term costs? <br />Methodoloeies for the Pro~ram Resources Factor mav include any of the following: <br />1 Are goals for reducingpollutants in stormwater dischar e~ being met b~fundin le~ vels? <br />2) Does the public accept rate charges? <br />3) Is the SWMP able to plan for future activities and control measures? <br />4) If resources are limited, is there a bene~t ~ained throu~h assessment compared to its <br />cost? [e.g. is exnensive samplin~ i~ vin~vou the information needed to adantivelv <br />manage vour program - would it be more beneficial to gather information on a re~ional <br />basis? <br />5 Other. <br />• - - - ~...~~ . **s. .~ ...'~~ <br />I DRAFT MEP Approach 03 24 08 detail,added.doc <br />