New Search
<br /> Message Page 1 of I <br /> HAM41N Peggy D <br /> From:,, CAHILL Michelle R <br /> Sent: ' Thursday, April 01, 2004 2:42 PM <br /> To: GALLUP Steve S; HEIL Richard J ~ <br /> Cc: KLOPE Paul W; SCHOENING Mark A; HAMLIN Peggy D <br /> Subject: RE: Valley River Center WW 12ehab <br /> I think it will work to take your $177,OOO,over budget amount for VR WW rehab out of the mother acct WWrehab <br /> utility furxl. <br /> This leaves about $59,000 which should cover the only two things I can think of we may need for. (these <br /> being additional funding for community sewer design (maybe), and very likely an additional $ needed for River Rd <br /> outstanding claim - an increase in our IGA to LC) <br /> It looks to me like our main rehab project is fully funded to match our (reduced/revised) estimate and it will bid in <br /> May. OUr community sewer work is only funded for design but won't be under construction until next year, so can <br /> tap the FY'05 community sewer budget. We also show a balance in 4009 and I'll talk to Rich about potentially <br /> closing that. <br /> The only, outstanding question is that since the project has been funded out of the reimbursement SDC $ is there <br /> a problem using the utility fund? We haven't done any work on the Legacy Extension job that has WW SDC so if <br /> it were spmehow more appropriate to use SDC that would be a potential. <br /> me <br /> ----0ri~inal Message----- <br /> From: GALLUP Steve S <br /> Sent: Wjednesday, March 31, 2004 4:28 PM <br /> To: HEIR Richard J; CAHILL Michelle R <br /> Cc: KLOPE Paul W <br /> Subject: Valley River Center WW Rehab <br /> 18~m in the process of closing out the above subject project and we went over budget due to change orders <br /> arhd extra engineering psf cost. The outstanding expense is around $177,000. Currently, on my revise <br /> budget summary I am showing this extra expense coming out of wastewater utility funds. Before I submit <br /> this revise budget, I wanted to check on the status of the ww utility fund. Michelle or Rich, let me know if <br /> you foresee a problem with this approach. Thanks. <br /> j~ ~4~pr~ X~'' ~ y33sZ <br /> ',53Z 8332 (o~73S 41~a~s" I82,S2Z.17U <br /> 532 Q332 (o~73S ~SSOtS' ~/8Z, SZ2.,o0~ <br /> ',,5'32 9332 ~n3sq~5ozo \ 5~,tfOO,Q~ <br /> 53Z g33z 4f73s ~IS07S ~y,goo,ao~ <br /> ar32 ~.33a ~~73s 9~SD7S l8~sl~L,.~~ ~ ,,~`-r«_e~ ~j~ x~- <br /> s32 i~z,o ~'~~r'7,sbb.~8~ ~ ~33$~j <br /> 4/2/20Q4 3.3 ~f q33 ~ ~ X735 9~so~s 92Z- ~ ~'87,5l0(0.~~ 7 <br /> HAMLIN Peggy D <br /> From:'. GALLUP Steve S <br /> Sent: ' Tuesday, April O6, 2004 2:03 PM <br /> To: HAMLIN Peggy D <br /> Subject: Valley River Center As-Built and Warranty Work <br /> After discussing this with the inspector, we have more inspectlonlas-built work than anticipated. 1 would say a <br /> budget of 60 hours would be more Goser. ~ SO ` = 44~d0 <br /> <br />