New Search
Message Page 1 of 1 <br /> HAMLIN Peggy D <br /> From: CAHILL Michelle R , <br /> Sent:' Thursday, April 01, 2004 2:42 PM <br /> To: GALLUP Steve S; HEIL Richard J <br /> Cc: KLOPE Paul W; SCHOENING Mark A; HAMLIN Peggy D <br /> SubjBCt: RE: Valley River Center WW Rehab <br /> I think it'will work to take your $177,000 over budget amount for VR WW rehab out of the mother acct WWrehab <br /> utility fuhd. <br /> This lea?~es about $59,000 which should cover the only two things I can think of we may need for. (these <br /> being additional funding for community sewer design (maybe), and very likely an additional $ needed for River Rd <br /> outstanding claim - an increase in our IGA to LC) <br /> It looks to me like our main rehab project is fully funded to match our (reduced/revised) estimate and it will bid in <br /> May. Our community sewer work is only funded for design but won't be under construction until next year, so can <br /> tap the ~Y'Q5 community sewer budget. We also show a balance in 4009 and I'll talk to Rich about potentially <br /> closing that. <br /> The only outstanding question is that since the project has been funded out of the reimbursement SDC $ is there <br /> a problem using the utility fund? We haven't done any work on the Legacy Extension job that has WW SDC so if <br /> it were somehow more appropriate to use SDC that would be a potential. <br /> me <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: GALLUP Steve S <br /> Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 4:28 PM <br /> To: HEII_ Richard J; CAHILL Michelle R <br /> Cc: KLOPE Paul W <br /> Subject: Valley River Center WW Rehab <br /> 1 dm in the process of closing out the above subject project and we went over budget due to change orders <br /> and extra engineering psf cost. The outstanding expense is around $177,000. Currently, on my revise <br /> budget summary I am showing this extra expense coming out of wastewater utility funds. Before I submit <br /> this revise budget, I wanted to check on the status of the ww utility fund. Michelle or Rich, let me know if <br /> yDU foresee a problem with this approach. Thanks. <br /> 13s1~ Y~~P''. x~' y338ZZ <br /> 532 q 332 ~17,~,~ R/~m75" 1 ~2, 52Z, aU <br /> ?r3Z 8332 1o~73S G)g$O!S <br /> .532 g33Z <182, SZz,o~~ <br /> 6t73sq~FSozo ~,~On,n~ <br /> 532 ~3.3Z 1r 1735 ~IS07S <y~gDD,LYJ~ <br /> af-3:l x.33 d lol73S C/I ~O7aS l ~~S(aG,~~F~ Ca ~ ,~-~~c.~.e~ x~y <br /> 53Z /120 ~'/87~sbb.~F~ ~ ~~~J~ <br /> 4/2/200 Say 9~3a ~~735 9iso7s922-~ 187,S~6.i~~ <br /> HAMLIN Peggy D <br /> From: GALLUP Steve S <br /> Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 2:03 PM <br /> To: HAMLIN Peggy D <br /> Subject: Valley River Center As-Built and Warranty Work <br /> <br /> After discussing this with the inspector, we have more inspection/as-built work than anticipated. I would say a <br /> budget of 60 hours would be more closer. ~ SD' = `E;~bO <br /> <br />