New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Admin Order 58-95-15
COE
>
PW
>
Admin
>
Execs
>
Admin Orders
>
Admin Order 58-95-15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2008 3:53:01 PM
Creation date
8/15/2008 3:37:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Exec
PW_Division_Exec
Administration
PWA_Project_Area
Admin Orders
PW_Subject
Mangan Park
Document_Date
10/3/1995
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
be in FY 97, or July, '96. Due to limited funding and maintenance _ <br /> restrictions, any work at that time would be limited to general grading and <br /> hard surfaced improvements that did not require frequent maintenance. Turf, <br /> landscape plantings and irrigation are particularly not one of the development <br /> options until maintenance capacity is restored.) <br /> Tim Patrick, Petersen Barn supervisor, stated that car problems in the park <br /> occur about twice a year. At Petersen prior to the sportsfields, there were <br /> some behavior problems in the park. When Kidsports activity came in, the <br /> behavior-type problems diminished. He suggested that soccer goals, therefore, <br /> might by appropriate for Mangan Park. On skateboarding, he suggested <br /> consulting with Marilyn Steele of Amazon Community Center. It is his <br /> understanding that there were problems in the beginning, but that they have <br /> staerred off now. He was sure skateboarding was an activity that here to <br /> y~ <br /> Janice Svetal, 2523 Mangan St., thought the location for the portable toilets <br /> should be moved closer the playground area. She also questioned how the park <br /> grading would go. (A topographic survey is needed first, which will reveal <br /> what elevation the park needs to be graded to. The basic plan should not <br /> change; the issue is whether the park will be one, two or three feet above the <br /> street.) <br /> REBUTTALS AND GENERAL COMMENTS <br /> Steve Buss, 4023 Wagner St., likes overall design. Has reservations about the <br /> BMX and skateboard facilities, and does not want the community to have to pick <br /> up the responsibility for them. <br /> Jim Lynch, 2359 N. Clarey #26. had concerns about children exiting cars, and <br /> thought off-street parking would be desirable. (To have or not have off- <br /> street parking was discussed. The intent of the park is to serve people <br /> within walking distance, and as long as the park did not become so attractive <br /> as to draw people from outside the neighborhood, any parking demand is <br /> expected to be accommodated with on-street, park side parking.) <br /> Sherry Christiansen, 1299 Taft, was concerned about park hours and night <br /> usage. She said that the BMX and skateboard facilities belonged in a larger <br /> park. <br /> Linda Lane, 1897 Laveta Dr.. also thought the skateboard bowl belonged in a <br /> bigger park. <br /> CONCLUSION <br /> Following a short general discussion, staff proposed that a final plan have <br /> the BMX and skateboard facilities deleted, and that the space be left open for <br /> other recreational amenities that future residents of the area might suggest. <br /> There was no disagreement with this proposal from any in attendence. Staff <br /> advised that the plan would be redrawn accordingly, and that an administrative <br /> <br /> adoption of the plan would follow. I <br /> <br /> Recorded by Lisa Goorjian with edits by John Etter <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.