New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Admin Order 58-96-23-F
COE
>
PW
>
Admin
>
Execs
>
Admin Orders
>
Admin Order 58-96-23-F
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2008 3:55:25 PM
Creation date
8/15/2008 2:02:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Exec
PW_Division_Exec
Administration
PWA_Project_Area
Admin Orders
PW_Subject
Street Tree Program
Document_Date
2/28/1996
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
f <br /> closely as possible to 30 curb feet on center with consideration for driveways and credits <br /> or waiver granted by the City Manager, Urban Forester, or Public Works." <br /> mug: The rules identify the desired spacing of trees to be on an average of 30 <br /> curb feet. The rules establish Location standards in R-7.280-C. l for the placement of trees <br /> to prevent conflicts with driveways and other structures. Depending on factors such as lot <br /> size, driveway size, block size, and the location of public improvement, the Location <br /> standards may not allow an average of a 30 curb foot spacing to be achieved. In those <br /> cases the maximum number of trees allowed by the location standards shall be the number <br /> required. Credit for preserving existing trees and waiver of the requirement to plant trees <br /> i have been provided in the revision to R-7.280-C.1 in response to comment 1. <br /> Comment 6: The requirement of R-7.280-D.3.3 that trees be 100% free from <br /> insects, disease, etc. is not practical, and the section should be clarified to require the trees <br /> + be "reasonably free" . <br /> i <br /> ~ Flildiag: I concur with this recommendation and Section R-7.280-D.3.3 has been <br /> ~ revised accordingly. <br /> comment 7: The requirement in R-7.280-D.3.4 that tree structural scaffold <br /> branches be at least 6" apart where they attach to the main trunk should be revised to <br /> require that the scaffold branches shall be well proportioned where they attach to the main <br /> ~ trunk. <br /> ~iug: I concur in part with .this recommendation, and Section R-7.280-D.3.4 <br /> f has been revised to provide that the structural scaffold branches shall be well proportioned <br /> ' where they attach to the main trunk with an average spacing of at least six inches. <br /> -Comment 8: The 2" caliper requirement for Arterial and Collector streets in R- <br /> 7..280 C.4.2 needs to be modified so that when the Cary takes possession of those trees, <br /> the trees are 2" in caliper. <br /> Eitlc~lg: I concur with this recommendation, and Section R-7.280-D.4.2 has been <br /> revised accordingly. <br /> Comment 9: There is no need to waste City resources/funds on extending <br /> administration time periods as required by R-7.280-E.1. If a tree has been replaced due <br /> to vandalism or other conditions and that tree meets City criteria, i.e., 1.5 or 2" caliper <br /> by the end of the original establishment period, then acceptance should be granted. <br /> E <br /> Finding: The purpose of a 3 year establishment period is to assure initial pruning <br /> and 3 years of watering are provided to a young tree before it is expected to survive on <br /> <br /> ~ its own in Eugene's summer climate. Requiring the establishment period to be extended <br /> Administrative Order - 3 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.