New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Admin Order 58-96-26-F
COE
>
PW
>
Admin
>
Execs
>
Admin Orders
>
Admin Order 58-96-26-F
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2008 3:56:09 PM
Creation date
8/15/2008 1:42:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Exec
PW_Division_Exec
Administration
PWA_Project_Area
Admin Orders
PW_Subject
Erosion Prevention Practices
Document_Date
1/22/1997
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
i <br /> Findinn: All construction activities that disturb land are affected by the program <br /> including the placement of building and landscape materials in the public right-of--way. <br /> Therefore, there is no need to adjust the rule. <br /> Comment 16: Why were the necessary materials needed for review, such as the <br /> manual, template, sensitive areas map not available for review? <br /> jl <br /> Finding: Most of these materials have been available for review since December <br /> 1995 and their availability has been announced publicly. <br /> Comment 17: Where does the program apply? <br /> Finding: Within the city limits of Eugene. <br /> Comment 18: Who is responsible for release of hazardous substances at a <br /> construction site. <br /> i <br /> FiFi <br /> dingy: For activities requiring an erosion permit, the permittee (property owner <br /> or easement holer) is responsible for meeting the requirements of the program and permit. <br /> For non-permitted conditions, property owner or easement holder. <br /> i <br /> Comment 19: The City Council should review the Administrative Rule prior to <br /> ' finalization. <br /> i, <br /> 'din :City Councilors were provided copies of the proposed rule and fee schedule <br /> I ! for their review. <br /> Comment 20: Program will affect cost of homes. <br /> ~I <br /> 1 in in :This issue was raised at the time the ordinance was considered. With most <br /> of the single family dwellings requiring a permit, costs to this group were considered <br /> minimized while benefits to water quality were raised. The ordinance was approved. This <br /> ~ issue is out of the scope of the Administrative Rule. Therefore, there is no need for rule <br /> <br /> ~ I adjustments at this time. <br /> Comment 21: Blanket permits should be allowed for new subdivisions. <br /> Fording: The umbrella permit, R6.645-F3.2, provides this application. Therefore, <br /> j there is no need to adjust the rule at this time. <br /> Comment 22: Stop work orders should only apply to the area of violation. <br /> Erosion Prevention Administrative Rule R-6.645 - 5 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.