New Search
4.3 Credit Distribution in the Absence of Directions from an Approved Sdc'Crectit <br /> Application <br /> 1 the event that the property :owner(s) Have been. notified of pending SDC credits, "but <br /> t e SDC Credit Application has not been completed- by the property owner(a) and <br /> a proved ~y thQ City Engineer within: 60 days of ...written. notification, ..with the <br /> ceptiont.of oases where tfie recovery of credit #hrough an equivalent assessment <br /> ' uncertain; the credit will be distributed by the';"equal-lot" method. All eligible lots. <br /> building situ; w711 be identified, and'the-credit will be dis#ributed in an equal <br /> ~ oun# to each.of;thes~ eligible lots or building sites. Credit applied under this <br /> licy wilt not be eiigibie.to be appealed. Development for which a permit is issued <br /> riot to administration of<credit disbufsal or approval"by City staff will not be <br /> c nsidered ®figible for credit distribution. <br /> 7 4.d' Changes o AnApprbved SDC Credit Application <br /> ny modifications to tbo :distribution-of credits must be 'approved by ttte City <br /> ngineer and ate outlined;in the SDC Policies and Procedures. Such modifications <br /> "it apply only to rernainin"g,credit ~satartces and pndeveloped lots or building sites. <br /> F r credit distributions established by the City using the "squat lot" method, the <br /> party owner(s) rrl!ay;cl~,ange thR distribution at anytime with the.submissivn and <br /> provat by.the Ciity Englneet of a SDC Formal .Credit Application#. For other credit <br /> stributionmsthod~s previously established by an applicant, a new application may <br /> subr~e#t;d ~tnd.apprt~ved fly the City Engineer: <br /> T.5 Gistt~h dpi ~ ,~?tt+c~tion <br /> 't'he;. AAalria~r"fit; ~r~@~~r~'~~`Fgtee s#~all apl~Ve, GOnditlQl~ally a"PPra#,±Q~,rty! <br /> an ap ica~bon in'ui~r'~~~~#,q~tt~tlre reason for-the decision St~,ch.a deatsid!rl~hag <br /> be ma led or peon~fi i~+trt~a`r~i~tl:~© the'applicant. . - . <br /> 7.6 relit and Imp#ctl'~~~ibtf'1~uration <br /> C 9~=f~~".~.k-s`:;`,'Fa!`C+~dp9Y document .shall be wltl available #ar use'up to <br /> a rnazi utit ~ ~~1~'~,~ of the prgnaf wri#ten not~fir±atian Credit remaining <br /> after a fien y~~~tt1~,A~~t.r applied to subsequeritp~rmits. <br /> imps rec1~ !!~;a~(~,~,,.i_,._F,s rnodology dooumer~t maybe used c~ttttl 5u~lt ti#rse <br /> as the ra~r.fr!rktilr longer contirrueto provide the an#icipated,teciuchan <br /> in de ,arid{ :#tre <;~`~i'mihed that assurances `or agreerniants from tfle <br /> level pair,: owi~iar, or ow~`t~ressors, are no longet,adequate fn ensure that tfte <br /> pt~og or fsc#lity will ~ to function as planned for tfiia agreed'trpon lime period. <br /> 8.0 Appe Is <br /> <br /> ~1n appeal y an applicant or a permittee of any decision of the City Manager or the Manager's <br /> designee un er these Methodologies shall be governed by EC 7.735 and must be filed and the appeal <br /> fee paid withi 15 working days of the date of the decision. Such appeals shall be in writing and filed <br /> at the City M Wagers office. The app~;fee, as established under EC ?0?O,;can be;faund in the <br /> ' tad SDC Fee schedule rh;'Appendix G, <br /> current ado <br /> Proposed ethodologies: City of Eugene SDCs (Effective March 01, 1997) Page 21 <br /> <br />