<br /> I ',r, <br /> i <br /> Written com nts were received from: <br /> ? Bruce A el <br /> Wanda , Ballentine <br /> ? Bonny S. Bettman, Eugene Citizen Involvement Committee; Friendly Area Neighborhood Association <br /> ? Patrick B onson <br /> Kathy Br ebaker, Home Builders Association of Lane County <br /> Steven C unard, Eugene Area Chamber of Commerce <br /> Eben Fo or, Energy & Environmental Planning Associates <br /> r David Gu set <br /> Richard unsaker, Bi-Mart Discount Store <br /> L. Jeff Jo es, Capstone Development <br /> Wells L. arvin, Marvin Investments, Inc. <br /> Murphy K McHugh, HcHugh Properties <br /> Original S stems Development Charge Citizens Advisory Committee (1990-1992) <br /> Merle Bottge o Bobby Green ~ Ken Nagao <br /> Paul icholson ~ Sue Prichard ~ Dale Riddle <br /> Miche I Roberts P Roger Rutan P Robert Tate <br /> ? Jonathan .Raney, Attorney at Law <br /> ? Jim Reed <br /> ? Gene San quist, Hawkins-Smith $ Sundquist Commercial Developers <br /> ? Paul Sim ns, Waremart Foods <br /> ? Gary Wildi h <br /> ? David Zup n <br /> In addition to t e specific findings noted above, based on review of the comments received and subsequent <br /> anaysis, Staff as recommended: (a) adoption of the Parks SDC rate as proposed in January 1997, <br /> reduction of th stormwater and transportation SDC rates from the January 1997 proposal, and retention of <br /> the current loc I wastewater SDC rates without the proposed January 1997 increase initially proposed, as <br /> more particular set forth below in the SDC Rate Table; (b) Section 2.3 in the SDC Methodology be <br /> annended to eli inate the Automatic Annual Adjustment process, so that future updates will be accomplished <br /> thlrough the Ci 's administrative rule making process as described in section 2.020 of the Eugene Code, <br /> 1 X71; (c) that d tention basins no longer be eligible for stormwater SOC credits, and retention basins, dry <br /> wells and other approved on site sysfems that completely contain the stormwater on-site continue to be credit <br /> eligible; (d) that other formatfing and text changes be amended as needed to clarify, improve, and simplify the <br /> Methodology; a d (e) inclusion of the MWMC Facilities Equalization Credits Table, to be attached to this <br /> administratve rder as Exhibit C. <br /> I f nd the SDC ethodology and Fees as proposed are consistent with adopted policies and provisions of the <br /> Eugene Cade, 971, and concur with staffs recommendations. Those recommendations and changes have <br /> been incorporat din Exhibit A. <br /> Exhibit B to Ad 'nistrative Order No. 58-97-02=F-2 Page 5 <br /> <br />