New Search
charge under section 7.705 of this chapter, the system development charge <br /> for the existing use shall be calculated and if it is less than the system <br /> <br /> l I development charge for the proposed use, the difference between the .system <br /> development charge for the existing use and the system development charge <br /> for the proposed use shall be the system development charge required under <br /> xection 7.705. If the change in use results in the system development <br /> icharge for the proposed use being less than the system development charge <br /> for the existing use, no system development charge shall be required, how- <br /> ever, no refund or credit shall be given. <br /> (3) The limitations on the use of credits contained in this sub- <br /> ection shall not apply when credits are given under subsection 7.730(4) of <br /> his section. A credit shall be given for the cost of a qualified public <br /> 'mprovement associated with .a development. If a qualified public improve- <br /> arcel of land that is <br /> ent is located partially on and partially off the p <br /> he subject of the approval, the credit shall be given only for the cost of <br /> he portion of the improvement not located on or wholly contiguous to the <br /> t'on shall be onl <br /> land. The credit rovided for b this.subsec i y <br /> arcel of p Y <br /> v e t bein <br /> or the ublic im rovement charge imposed for the type of impro em n g <br /> onstructed and shall not exceed the public improvement charge even if the <br /> ost of the. capital improvement exceeds the applicable public improvement <br /> harge. <br /> (4) When establishing the methodology, the city manager may pro- <br /> ide for a credit against the public improvement charge, the reimbursement <br /> jfee, or both, for a capital improvement constructed as part of the develop- <br /> ment that reduces the development's demand upon existing capital improve- <br /> ents or the need for future capital improvements or that would otherwise <br /> ave to be constructed at city expense under the then-existing council pol~- <br /> ies. <br /> (5) Except to the extent that a capital improvement for which a <br /> ccredit is given is part of the phasing of a larger project and that the <br /> 'redit received against the systems development charge is greater than the <br /> harge for the phase where the capital improvement is constructed, credit <br /> shall not be transferable from one development to~another. <br /> (6) Credit shall not be transferable from one type of capital im- <br /> provements to another. <br /> 7.735 SOC - Appeal Procedures. <br /> (1) As used in this section "working day" means a day when the <br /> general offices of the city are open to transact business with the public. <br /> (2) A person aggrieved by a decision required or permitted to be <br /> ade by the city manager or the manager's designee under sections 7.700 to <br /> 7.730 or a person challenging the propriety of an expenditure of systems <br /> development charge .revenues may appeal the decision or the expenditure by <br /> filing with the city manager's office a written request for consideration by <br /> the hearings officer and by paying the fee for an appeal established under <br /> section 2.020 of this code. Such appeal shall describe with particularity <br /> the decision or the expenditure from which the person appeals and shall com- <br /> i ply with subsection (4) of this section. <br /> (3) An appeal of an expenditure must be filed within two years of <br /> 'the date of alleged improper expenditure. An appeal challenging the metho- <br /> idology may only be filed within 15 working days of the city manager's deci- <br /> is ion, thereafter unless modified by the council or a court the methodology <br /> Ordinance - 9 <br /> <br />