New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Admin Order 58-97-19-F
COE
>
PW
>
Admin
>
Execs
>
Admin Orders
>
Admin Order 58-97-19-F
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2008 4:13:37 PM
Creation date
8/15/2008 10:26:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Exec
PW_Division_Exec
Administration
PWA_Project_Area
Admin Orders
PW_Subject
Industrial Pretreatment Program
Document_Date
10/29/1997
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Waste Hauler discharging wastes at a unpermitted discharge point (second <br /> violation). The commenter questioned what happened following the first violation, <br /> and why an irresponsible hauler would be given a second chance. <br /> Finding: The penalty for the first incident of discharging at an unpermitted <br /> discharge point is raised from $500 to $1000 in the proposed changes to the <br /> Enforcement Response Guide. Escalating or progressive enforcement is included <br /> throughout the Enforcement Response Guide, and is a requirement in the federal <br /> pretreatment regulations for preparation of enforcement plans. Allowing a hauler <br /> a second chance following a first violation is in accordance with this philosophy. <br /> Following a second violation, a hauler's permit would be revoked, and discharge <br /> privileges removed. <br /> F. In addition to the specific findings set forth above, I find that the proposed <br /> revisions are consistent with the directions of the City Council, and are necessary in order <br /> to recover the City's costs associated with monitoring the City's industrial pretreatment <br /> program and achieving compliance therewith by industrial users in accordance with the <br /> Council's recent amendment of Section 2.018(5) of the Eugene Code, 1971 which <br /> increased the maximum amount of civil penalty that may be imposed for violations of that <br /> program. <br /> On the basis of these findings, I order that: <br /> 1. Appendix A, Industrial Pretreatment Program Enforcement Response Guide <br /> is hereby amended as proposed, as reflected in the attachment hereto, which is <br /> incorporated herein by reference. <br /> 2. The City Recorder is directed to replace the Appendix A attached to <br /> Administrative Order No. 58-93-17 with a copy of the Appendix A attached hereto, and to <br /> reflect this amendment thereon and in the City's records. <br /> Dated and effective this ~ day of Oc ber, 1997. <br /> Vicki Elmer <br /> City Manager <br /> <br /> Administrative Order - 6 10/22/97 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.