New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Admin Order 58-99-16-F-2
COE
>
PW
>
Admin
>
Execs
>
Admin Orders
>
Admin Order 58-99-16-F-2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2008 4:22:05 PM
Creation date
8/14/2008 12:05:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Exec
PW_Division_Exec
Administration
PWA_Project_Area
Admin Orders
PW_Subject
SDC Methodology
Document_Date
10/29/1999
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
p <br /> u <br /> ~iH <br /> s" <br /> comments concerning the MWMC (regional) wastewater SDC rates included <br /> " recommendations to: 1) delete duplicate of category 64; 2) revise label of category <br /> 51 to correctly reflect Wholesale /Distribution; 3) add labels to the five Industrial <br /> Process Strength categories; 4) revise category B6, (Carwash) to previous unit type <br /> j but maintain a rate of charge per unit type that reflects the same basis for rate of <br /> charge as originally proposed (does not constitute an increase in rate). <br /> Findings: Attachment 4, MWMC (Regional) Wastewater Rates has been <br /> revised to 1) delete duplicate 64 category; 2) Revise 51 category label to Wholesale <br /> /Distribution; 3) add labels of L (Low), M (Medium), H (High), V (Very High) and S <br /> (Super High); 4) revise the Carwash category (B6) to reflect no change of unit type <br /> f~ but still reflect a rate per unit that is consistent with the basis for rate change as <br /> ~i"~ originally proposed. <br /> I' In addition to the revisions noted in the above comments and findings, staff identified some <br /> I'~ corrections to typographical errors and other minor cosmetic changes needed to improve <br /> h clarity and readability which have also been incorporated in Exhibit A hereto. <br /> +i" <br /> ~I <br /> ' ~V G. Based on the findings and staff recommendations set forth above, I find that <br /> j', the revisions to the Systems Development Charge Methodology and fees as proposed by <br /> II Administrative Order 58-99-16 and incorporated in Exhibit A hereto are consistent with <br /> adopted policies and ordinances of the City, are in conformity with applicable state iaw, and <br /> ~ ~I should be implemented effective November 1, 1999. I further find that it would be more <br /> I~ efficient to incorporate this revision and prior revisions in one document, and repeal <br /> Administrative Order Nos. 58-97-02-F, 58-97-07-F, 58-98-10-F, and 58-99-16-1-F and the <br /> ~r Systems Development Charge Methodology adopted and/or amended therein. <br /> is <br /> On the basis of these findings, I order that: <br /> 1. The City's Systems Development Charge Methodology attached as Exhibit <br /> I' A hereto is hereby amended as adopted and reflected in Findings B through F above, and <br /> i" the unamended portions thereof are ratified and affirmed, effective November 1, 1999. <br /> i <br /> I~ 2. Administrative Order Nos. 58-97-02-F, 58-97-07-F, 58-98-10-F, and 58-99- <br /> 16-F-1, and the Systems Development Charge Methodology adopted and/or amended <br /> therein, are repealed, as of midnight, October 31, 1999. <br /> Dated this 29~' day of October, 1999. <br /> E~ <br /> James R. Johnson <br /> <br /> I City Manager <br /> Administrative Order - 4 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.