New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Admin Order 58-02-02-F
COE
>
PW
>
Admin
>
Execs
>
Admin Orders
>
Admin Order 58-02-02-F
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2008 3:36:09 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 3:51:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Exec
PW_Division_Exec
Administration
PWA_Project_Area
Admin Orders
PW_Subject
TIA Standards
Document_Date
6/25/2002
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
impact analysis does not negate the ability of the City Traffic Engineer to require improvements by <br /> other means specified in the Eugene Code, 1971 or rules or regulations adopted thereunder. <br /> 3. In addition to the above criteria, if the Traffic Impact Analysis Review was required <br /> based on R-9.8650-B-4. (EC 9.8670(4)), the improvements shall also address the structural capacity <br /> of the street in the County's jurisdiction and address identified structural deficiencies, or reduction <br /> in the useful life of existing street structures related to the proposed development. Improvements <br /> may be needed to eliminate the identified structural deficiencies and to accommodate vehicle <br /> impacts to structures. <br /> R-9.8650-D Traffc Impact Analysis (TIA~ Determination of Peak Hour Trips. <br /> i <br /> The determination of eak hour tri s shall be made b consultin the most current version <br /> j P P Y g <br /> of the Institute of Transportation Engineers' Trig Generation Manual. <br /> R-9.8650-E 3'raffic Impact Analysis (TIA~ -Exception to Requirements. <br /> i As part of a Type II or III review, the City Planning Director, or designee, may grant an <br /> exception to any or all of the content requirements of R-9.8650-F when both of the following aze <br /> met: <br /> 1. A development will generate less than 100 trips in any peak hour. <br /> 2. The applicant has demonstrated that submittal of the item(s) listed in R-9.8650-F is <br /> not necessary in order to show compliance with the arrroval criteria of R-9.8650-C. <br /> R-9.8650-F Traffic Imuact Analysis (TIA~-Report Requirements. <br /> i <br /> Unless an exception is granted pursuant to R-9.8650-E, the following items aze required as <br /> part of a TIA: <br /> i <br /> ~ 1. Report Certification. All traffic studies shall be prepazed by or under the direct <br /> supervision of a Professional Civil or Traffic Engineer currently licensed to practice within the State <br /> of Oregon, and with special training and experience in transportation engineering and planning. The <br /> engineer shall certify the TIA document by providing a signature and seal of approval. <br /> 2. Extent of Study Area. The applicant and the City Traffic Engineer, or designee shall <br /> agree on the defined study area prior to commencement of the prepazation of the TIA. The analysis <br /> must include an examination of all site access drives, adjacent roadways, and other roadways and <br /> ~ ~ intersections that will receive 50 or more additional peak hour trips as a result of completion of the <br /> proposed development or land use application. <br /> 3. Selection of Horizon Years for Data Required by R-9.8650-F-4 to F-11. <br /> <br /> I <br /> Administrative Order - 3 <br /> r.\adminord\~ules\02stdstia2ao.wpd(06/19/02) <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.