New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Admin Order 58-06-06
COE
>
PW
>
Admin
>
Execs
>
Admin Orders
>
Admin Order 58-06-06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2008 3:44:30 PM
Creation date
8/12/2008 3:07:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Exec
PW_Division_Exec
Administration
PWA_Project_Area
Admin Orders
PW_Subject
Stormwater Management Manual Adoption
Document_Date
5/2/2006
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
surface and is isolated from the pollution reduction facility; (2) the area generating untreated runoff <br /> is less than 500 square feet of impervious surface and it is not technically feasible to drain the <br /> <br /> ice, untreated runoff to the pollution reduction facility; (3) constructing pollution reduction facilities to <br /> treat the runoff from the area at issue would require removal of trees or damage other natural <br /> resources; or, (4) the area generating untreated runoff is less than 500 square feet of impervious <br /> surface and limited access to the area would prevent regular maintenance of the pollution reduction <br /> facility. <br /> 3. An applicant can seek an adjustment to the requirement that all pollution reduction facilities must <br /> be selected, sited and constructed in accordance with the Stormwater Management Manual and that <br /> all facilities must be designed using one of the three methodologies outlined in the Manual if all of <br /> the following requirements are met: (1) the proposed alternative design will achieve equal, or <br /> superior, results for reducing pollution, maintainability and safety and the proposed siting does not <br /> adversely affect structures or other properties; (2) the applicant's written description of the proposed <br /> alternative design has been reviewed and approved by the City Engineer; (3) the applicant has <br /> Submitted a method and schedule for monitoring the effectiveness of the proposed design; and, (4) <br /> the applicant has submitted a signed statement that the applicant will replace the alternative facility if <br /> the facility does not function as proposed. <br /> 4. An applicant can seek an adjustment to the requirement that the applicant demonstrate that peak <br /> rates of flow delivered to an existing open waterway at a point above 500 feet will not increase <br /> during storms larger than the water quality design storm and smaller than the flood control design <br /> storm as a result of the subject development if the proposed flow control facility will control flow <br /> rates as much as possible and one of the following applies: (1) the area generating untreated runoff is <br /> less than 500 square feet of impervious surface and is isolated from the flow control facility; (2) the <br /> area generating runoff is less than 500 square feet of impervious surface and it is not technically <br /> feasible to drain the untreated runoff to the pollution reduction facility; (3) constructing pollution <br /> reduction facilities to treat the runoff from the area at issue would require removal of trees or damage <br /> other natural resources; or, (4) the area generating untreated runoff is less than 500 square feet of <br /> impervious surface and limited access to the area would prevent regular maintenance of the flow <br /> control facility. <br /> 5. An applicant can seek an adjustment to the requirement that all flow control facilities must be <br /> selected from and sited, designed and constructed according to the Stormwater Management Manual <br /> if all of the following requirements are met: (1) the proposed alternative design will achieve equal, or <br /> superior, results for reducing pollution, maintainability and safety and the proposed siting does not <br /> adversely affect structures or other properties; (2) the applicant's written description of the proposed <br /> alternative design has been reviewed and approved by the City Engineer; (3) the applicant has <br /> submitted a method and schedule for monitoring the effectiveness of the proposed design; and, (4) <br /> the applicant has submitted a signed statement that the applicant will replace the alternative facility if <br /> the facility does not function as proposed. <br /> 6. An applicant can seek an adjustment to the requirement that all oil control facilities be sited, <br /> Exhibit A to Administrative Order No. 58-06-06-F 5 Of 9 <br /> Findings of Consistency <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.