New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Admin Order 58-06-06
COE
>
PW
>
Admin
>
Execs
>
Admin Orders
>
Admin Order 58-06-06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2008 3:44:30 PM
Creation date
8/12/2008 3:07:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Exec
PW_Division_Exec
Administration
PWA_Project_Area
Admin Orders
PW_Subject
Stormwater Management Manual Adoption
Document_Date
5/2/2006
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Finding: The River Road/Santa Clara area and urban transition areas are already identified <br /> in the City Code and land use regulations. As such, no changes were made to the design manual. <br /> Comment 12: Will all pollution reduction and flow control facilities designed using the <br /> SIM form always comply with the requirements, regardless of location and surrounding level <br /> of urbanization? <br /> Finding: Yes, the sizing factors were developed based on the most conservative design <br /> parameters, including the lowest infiltration rates, and impervious surface area at full build-out based <br /> upon Metro Plan land use designations. Inquiry and response only. <br /> Comment 13: Will the performance approach for downsizing facilities be allowed when <br /> headwater flow controls are not required? <br /> Finding: Yes. The performance approach is an alternative to the simplified approach to <br /> sizing facilities. The performance approach may be used for sizing pollution reduction and/or flow <br /> control facilities regardless of location, and requires calculations to verify that a facility design meets <br /> the requirements for a particular site. The simplified approach assumes (conservatively) that both <br /> pollution reduction and flow control requirements apply. In non-headwaters areas, where flow <br /> control requirements do not apply, the manual indicates that the performance approach may be used <br /> <br /> to downsize facilities, in acknowledgement that by using the simplified approach a facility maybe <br /> over-designed. <br /> Application of flow control requirements is limited to the headwaters area due to its unique <br /> physical characteristics that make it especially vulnerable to erosion and downcutting of streams and <br /> drainages with steep slopes, highly erodible soils, and high runoff velocities during rainfall events. <br /> Inquiry and response only. <br /> Comment 14: Can initial feasibility testing for infiltration be waived if existing testing <br /> data is on file, regardless of the date? <br /> Finding: Yes, provided the site is unchanged. Inquiry and response only. <br /> Comment 15: What provisions for access for operation and maintenance wilUshould be <br /> applied in the River Road/Santa Clara basin? <br /> Finding: Applicants are required to submit an operation and maintenance plan which <br /> describes and visually depicts access to the facility for operations and maintenance purposes. The <br /> Eugene Code,1971 requires that all stormwater facilities constructed pursuant to code requirements <br /> be operated and maintained by the owner. Applicants requesting city maintenance of their proposed <br /> facilities, must provided access for city equipment before the city will enter into an agreement with <br /> the applicant to take on maintenance responsibilities. Inquiry and response only. <br /> Administrative Order - 5 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.