New Search
change is being made to the fee schedule as a result of this comment. <br /> Co~m~nt 3: Part time worker recruitment and retention is a problem with TSA and this <br /> fee ould hurt the part time worker. If TSA is not exempt from the fee, part time workers <br /> sho Id #~ot be charged the same fee as a full-time worker. <br /> Fin in :The majority of tenants at the airport have part-time workers, and they use the <br /> faci ides, the entry and exit gates, and cause wear and tear on equipment and pavement <br /> the ame amount each day as a full-time worker. Handling a parking permit for apart- <br /> tim~ w©rker requires the same amount of administrative support as for afull-time worker. <br /> No change is being made to the fee schedule as a result of this comment. <br /> Em ra d Cit <br /> Co m nt 1: Asserted that when its lease was negotiated, it was "at the very least <br /> imp iec~" that employee parking was free. Imposing this proposed fee on tenants during <br /> exi in~ leases would violate the lease. <br /> Fin in :There is no mention of free employee parking in the lease agreement, nor was <br /> it i piked. Imposition of the fee would not violate the lease, and no change is being <br /> ma e t~ the fee schedule as a result of this comment. <br /> Co~tt~nent 2: Noted that the cracks were sealed in the employee parking lot in <br /> conjunction with the administration lot repave last year, and inquired as to what other <br /> costs have been accrued for parking lot maintenance in the last 5 years. <br /> Fin, i :Usual maintenance and cleaning of the lot occurs on a regular basis. This fee <br /> is t~ help offset the costs of the new access system as well as maintenance of the lot and <br /> the ;administrative costs associated with processing and tracking employee parking. No <br /> chak~ge is being made to the fee schedule as a result of this comment. <br /> Co ~ ent 3: Asserted a belief that the fees would have an overall negative impact on <br /> theEugene Airport. <br /> Fi di : I do not believe the fee will have a negative impact on the airport, as it is a <br /> contimon practice within the airport industry. As noted in response to Comment 2, it will <br /> held tq recoup the costs of the new system, and recover maintenance and administrative <br /> cons. 'No change is being made to the fee schedule as a result of this comment. <br /> Co ent 4: Larger airports that charge employee parking fees likely have more <br /> re otely located employee parking and therefore have much higher associated costs. <br /> Fi ' di While it is true that remote lots may have additional expenses such as bus <br /> se icE, rt would be assumed those expenses would be factored into the fees charged. As <br /> no d 'lin other Findings above, the fees being established by this order will allow the <br /> ai or~ to recover costs associated with providing employee parking at the Eugene <br /> ai orQ. No change is being made to the fee schedule as a result of this comment. <br /> HarizQn Air: Horizon Air initially submitted some written comments and objections <br /> <br /> Administr tive Order <br /> i <br /> i <br /> <br />