New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Groundwater Protection
COE
>
PW
>
Admin
>
Execs
>
Executive non-confidential
>
Historical
>
Groundwater Protection
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/11/2010 9:58:19 AM
Creation date
8/6/2008 10:25:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Exec
PW_Division_Exec
Administration
PWA_Project_Area
Policy
PW_Subject
Groundwater Protection
Document_Date
8/6/2008
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
.~f!~. <br /> ~ ~ - ~ Groundwater Protection a <br /> ~Y~~~,~~...~~. f <br /> k Top Priority for ACWA <br /> Fee Proposal Forwarded for Underground Injection Control (Uic) Devices <br /> Oregonians rely on groundwater as a fresh, clean supply of drinking water. Almost half ofOregonians - - 1.4 million people <br /> - -depend on groundwater for- their daily water. Seventy-seven percent of Oregonians depend on groundwater for at <br /> least some of their water needs. <br /> Federal and state Safe Drinking WaterAct Underground TOO Llittle MOney <br /> j Injection Control (UIC) regulations control how t0 Run Statewide Program <br /> ~ stormwater can be disposed of below ground. UIC wells <br /> can be a threat to drinking water if not properly designed, The problem is one of resources. UIC program funding <br /> is currently limited to federal funds -and those federal <br /> constructed, and maintained. The Federal Environmental funds pay for less than one.full time staff person (currently <br /> Protection Agency (EPA) regulations set regulatory funded at 0.8 of a full time position). The current Oregon <br /> framework for UIC wells. Oregon requested and received program registers an average of I-,550 UICs per year and <br /> delegation to operate the UIC program in Oregon. approves I ,250 UICs as meeting the Oregon rules. <br /> The program is severely underfunded. tt currently has The funding is not adequate to operate a statewide <br /> federal funding for 0.8 staff for a program that covers the program <br /> <br /> ! entire state, and~registers about I, 500 new UICs a year. To <br /> fund a program that protects drinking water and provides ACWA members interested in the UlCprogram <br /> technical assistance to municipalities and the development evaluated a number of options including <br /> community, user fees for UICs will be necessary. <br /> • Return program to EPA <br /> A group of municipalities and DEQ staff reviewed the UIC If the program is returned to EPA, EPA will likely <br /> program, outlined options, and developed a recommended take an enforcement approach, putting developers <br /> a set of UIC fees for consideration by the 2007 Oregon and local governments at risk EPA will operate the <br /> Le islature. <br /> g ro ram from their Seattle re Tonal office offerin <br /> P.g g g <br /> little opportunity for interaction and technical <br /> "The current Oregon UIC program needs improvement assistance to Oregon municipalities and developers. <br /> to provide adequate levels of service to its stakeholders;' <br /> said.Shannon Taylor of the City of Redmond and co-chair Institute reasonable fees so DEQ can run <br /> of the ACWA Groundwater Committee. "I believe that the program <br /> the additional resources provided in this proposal are Local control means a better program for developers <br /> a good start at increasing the level of service required and municipalities, while improving groundwater <br /> to administer a program of this nature.. It is important protection. Local governments and DEQ believe the <br /> that UIC program services be provided by regional program can best be run at the state/local level. A <br /> Oregon DEQ staff to ensure that the groundwater in our set of reasonable fees will allow the program to meet <br /> community is protected, our unique climate and hydrology the needs of both municipalities and fhe development <br /> is balariced with cost-effective stormwater disposal community along with protecting Oregon's <br /> methods, and the growth within our communities can groundwater resource, the drinking water supply for <br /> continue to be supported;' she said. the' majority of Oregonians. <br /> "Funding the DEQ's UIC program through user fees is Request genera[ funding for the program <br /> the fairest and best way to keep the UIC program under DEQ has indicated it is not inclined to ask for General <br /> Oregon's control," added Ollie Fick with the City of Bend. Funds to support this program, at this time. <br /> The City of Bend strongly supports the ACWAIDEQ <br /> funding proposal," he said. <br /> Continued ? <br /> ' wdiS,'o'~i, af~~ <br /> CLEAN <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.