New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Highway Safety Improvement Program
COE
>
PW
>
Admin
>
Execs
>
Executive non-confidential
>
Historical
>
Highway Safety Improvement Program
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/11/2010 9:58:22 AM
Creation date
8/6/2008 9:49:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Exec
PW_Division_Exec
Engineering
PWA_Project_Area
Transportation
PW_Subject
Highway Safety Improvement Program Bill
Document_Date
9/26/2008
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
3. Within the HSIP, what safety elements are "sun setting" and which are emerging? <br /> The most significant change is the elevation of the HSIP as a new "core funding" program <br /> administered by FHWA, defined by 23USC148. This new section replaces the previous <br /> 23USC152 (hazard elimination program), and will incorporate hazard elimination program <br /> elements as well as establish eligibility for additional types of highway safety improvement <br /> projects. As part of the new HSIP, each State's apportionment of HSIP funds is subject to a set <br /> aside for construction and operational improvements on high-risk rural roads and for railway- <br /> highway crossings. <br /> 4. How does the new HSIP differ from the old HSIP? <br /> The "new" HSIP (23USC 148) is established as an FHWA "core" program with separate funding. <br /> Prior to SAFETEA-LU, States were required to carry out a highway safety improvement <br /> program to reduce the number and severity ofhighway-related crashes and to decrease the <br /> potential for crashes on all highways. The requirements for the previous HSIP, as specified in <br /> the Code of <br /> Federal Regulations, Title 23, Part 924, were to consist of components for planning, <br /> implementation, and evaluation of safety programs and projects. Several categorical safety <br /> programs, including the Hazard Elimination Program and the Highway-Rail Grade Crossings <br /> Program, provided funding for the implementation of countermeasures. Under TEA-21, these <br /> programs were funded as a set-aside from Surface Transportation Program (STP) funds. <br /> The new HSIP is eligible for additional funds from the Equity Bonus program, but HSIP funds <br /> are now subject to lapse. Funds are apportioned through a formula based on each State's share <br /> of lane miles and vehicle miles traveled on Federal-aid highways and fatalities on the Federal-aid <br /> system in each State. The new HSIP requires a State transportation department to develop a <br /> Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) with a process that is data driven, comprehensive, and <br /> includes consultation with other key safety stakeholders in the State. Also new is the sub- <br /> allocation (set-aside) within each State for construction and operational improvements on High <br /> Risk Rural Roads. <br /> 5. Does the, new Highway Safety Improvement Program provide "dedicated" Obligation <br /> Authority? <br /> <br /> No. The new Highway Safety Improvement Program is a "core" program in the same way that <br /> the National Highway System, the Surface Transportation Program, and the Interstate <br /> Maintenance Program are "core" programs. The Obligation Authority issued to a State (with <br /> certain exceptions) may be utilized at the State's discretion for any core program with sufficient <br /> unobligated Contract Authority. <br /> <br /> FHWA Office of Safety; 9/14/05 Page 2 of 8 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.