New Search
opinion in this. <br /> 3. Lack of EWEB Utility/Construction Permits for Telecom Work in the ROW <br /> Construction staff had noted in April 00 that EWEB did not appear to be applying for the proper <br /> permits for its telecom construction in the ROW. After the May 00 election I informed Debra <br /> <br /> Wright of EWEB our concern and she affirmed that EWEB should and would be complying with <br /> <br /> the City's construction permit procedures. I asked Public Works staffto keep me informed. <br /> 4. EWEB Telecom Use of the ROW Franchise and Fees <br /> <br /> Debra Wright confirmed that EWEB will comply with franchising requirements deemed appropri- <br /> ate by the City. The Franchise Manager informed them that at the point they lease fiber, dark or <br /> lit, to one or more customers for non-electric purposes, a franchise must be in place, with an <br /> appropriate 7% fee. As of August O1, EWEB continues to finalize a franchise but will await the <br /> Sept O1 council vote to determine whether EWEB will use their telecom netowrk for non-electric <br /> commercial purposes. <br /> Staff Contacts: Pam Berrian (x5590) or Randy Kolb (x5075), ASD/ISD <br /> • Relevant Documents <br /> 1. Ordinance 20083 (management and compensation) <br /> <br /> 2. Contract provided by EWEB to City staff for telecom connectivity. <br /> 3. EWEB telecom project overview <br /> <br /> 4: Policy approved by Execs - use of City property for private telecom facilities. <br /> 5. MOU between City and EWEB re: telecommunications <br /> 6. Joint City-EWEB Resolution 4626, March 2000 <br /> <br /> 7. PAN Group Agreements, 2000 <br /> 8. June 25, 2001 EWEB packet to city council <br /> <br /> 9. September 19, 2001 EWEB packet to City Council <br /> <br /> • EWEB Contacts: Debra Wright; ~z~; Mark Oberle; Marty Douglass <br /> Page -4- <br /> <br />