Guidelines for Evaluating City Pr <br /> je <br /> tsr or Sa he <br /> on/ESA Impacts <br /> March 6, 2002 <br /> Feedback Questionaire for Guidelines.doc <br /> Please help us improve the Guidelines by answering the following uestion <br /> completed (e.g., Rasor Park Master Plan), please try to put yourself in the min f Your project has already been <br /> <br /> • Please return the completed questionnaire to Eric Wold Eu ene dset of when your project first began. <br /> ( g PDD) m digital format. <br /> Your Name: Louis Kroeck <br /> Project Name: Delta Ponds Restoration <br /> 1. How helpful were the Guidelines in helping identify potential <br /> project? Salmon or ESA issues related to your <br /> f 1 =Not helpful at all. <br /> i <br /> ~ 2 =Somewhat helpful <br /> 3 =Very helpful. <br /> ~ X 4 =Extremely helpful. <br /> i <br /> 2. In what ways were the Guidelines helpful to you? (check all that a 1 <br /> X Providing an "early warning" of potential ESA/Salmonpissues r <br /> _ Providing potential strategies or solutions on issues where the project anted to the project. <br /> X Providing contact names of people who could provide answers to s ~ ay have ESA conflicts. <br /> - They were not helpful. ome of my questions. <br /> - Other. Please explain in the space below. <br /> 3 • What aspects of the Guidelines were confusing? please recommend <br /> elements. possible ways to improve the confusing <br /> I <br /> found the guidelines quite clear and easy to use. <br /> 4. Are there additional pieces of information that you would like to see i <br /> what they are. ncluded in the Guidelines? Please describe <br /> ,None occurs to me at this time. <br /> 5. Given that there are potential civil and criminal penalties associated with violations of th <br /> are you (verv suunortive, somewhat supportive, not supportive) of using the Guidelines i <br /> e ESA "no take" policy, <br /> process. n the project planning <br /> I think the guidelines are a necessi <br /> ty for the project planning process so I am ve su f <br /> work that has gone into making an easy to use document to assist project mana ers. ` <br /> ~ pportive and appreciate the <br /> g i <br /> 6. Briefly describe the orientation that you received on how to use the Guideline <br /> sufficient for you to understand how to use the Guidelines? s• Was the level of orientation <br /> You would like to have in an orientation session. If not, please describe what additional information i <br /> I had an orientation by Eric but I think the document is easy to use without much orientatio <br /> n. <br /> 7. Describe your comfort level evaluatin ~ <br /> High comfort level, but then most of the gsuesrindicated by the document have alread bee <br /> thought about at the Delta Ponds because of the nature of the project and the number o a z <br /> y n addressed or at least <br /> support to the project. <br /> f gencies providing staff <br /> 8. What level of support from the ESA/Salmon Team would you prefer in order <br /> identify potential solutions for potential ESA/Salmon issues? <br /> to complete this evaluation and <br /> Assistance with reviewing the project for effectiveness ofproposed actions will/has been the ' <br /> be needed as the design progresses. most hel . <br /> p More will <br /> Page 3 <br /> <br />