New Search
Feedback Questionnaire for the <br /> Guidelines for Evaluating City Projects for Salmon/ESA Impacts <br /> March 6, 2002 <br /> Feedback Questionaire for Guidelines.doc <br /> Please help us improve the Guidelines by answering the following questions. If your project has already been <br /> completed (e.g., Rasor Park Master Plan), please try to put yourself in the mindset of when your project first began. <br /> Please. return the completed questionnaire to Eric Wold (Eugene PDD) in digital format. <br /> Your Name: Robin Hostik <br /> Project Name: Rasor Park Master Plan <br /> i <br /> 1. How helpful were the Guidelines in hel in identif <br /> project? p g y potential Salmon or ESA issues related to your <br /> 1 =Not helpful at all. <br /> 2 =Somewhat helpful <br /> 3 =Very helpful <br /> 4 =Extremely helpful. <br /> ~ 2. In what ways were the Guidelines helpful to you? (check all that a 1 <br /> <br /> j X Providing an "early warning" of potential ESA/Salmon issues related to the ro'ect <br /> X Providing potential strategies or solutions on issues where the project may have ESA conflicts. <br /> X Providing contact names of people who could provide answers to some of m uesti <br /> y q ons. <br /> - They were not helpful. <br /> - Other. Please explain in the space below. <br /> 3. What aspects of the Guidelines were confusing? Please recommend possible ways to improve the confusing <br /> elements. <br /> .Not confusing. <br /> 4. Are there additional pieces of information that you would like to see included in the Guidelines? Please describe <br /> what they are. <br /> Yes - a Zink to or access to relevant stormwater BMP's; examples of or links to impervious surface alternatives <br /> (also where they have been used effectively). <br /> i <br /> 5. Given that there are potential civil and criminal penalties associated with violations of the ESA "no take" policy, <br /> are you (very supportive, somewhat supportive, not supportive) of using the Guidelines in the project planning <br /> process. <br /> ..even if there were no penalties. <br /> 6. Briefly describe the orientation that you received on how to use the Guidelines. Was the level of orientation <br /> sufficient for you to understand how to use the Guidelines? If not, please describe what additional information <br /> you would like to have in an orientation session. <br /> Eric - I <br /> found youY process very clear, comprehensive, and user <br /> friendly! The only thing I would <br /> recommend is an Appendix or online collection of <br /> plans showing examples of <br /> projects (Plans... most <br /> engineers and designers are used to dealing with something tangible) that could impact salmon and <br /> exactly how they could be improved. Include, for example, lots of information about technology (e.g., <br /> impervious surface, even consider supplying alternative construction details!) that most people are ! <br /> unfamiliar with and therefore likely to research and use. I know, it's a lot of work <br /> for someone, but a <br /> picture is worth a thousand words. <br /> 7. Describe your comfort level evaluating your project using the Guidelines? <br /> ,High. <br /> Page 1 <br /> i <br /> <br />