Coburg Connection (4) - Laserfiche WebLink

New Search

,ti . There have already been at least two decisions made regarding sewer services from outside the UGB: the Eugene airport and Short Mountain. Each of these was considered on its merits without the creation of a universal program.. As each of these is dealt with individually, a series of common answers does develop, so that the fourth and. fifth times (if they ever happen)-the ,answers will be easier. But it is not fair to expect the MWMC staff to guess what all these future requests.might be like. And it is not fair fo Coburg for it to wait and pay so much for something that will need to be changed in the future anyway. What Coburg was suggesting wasaess time consuming, and less expensive. Coburg was proposing to take all the answers to these questions that have already developed, and apply them to Coburg and the, MWMC. Coburg was suggesting that Coburg and MWIVIG build a model and ..establish a precedent by resolving the issues rather than studying them, discussing them, solving them, in theory, and then seeing if they apply to Coburg. It is in the best interests of the people of Eugene. to allow Coburg to connect. The last time . Eugene. was faced: with a ground water problem outside the city (in River Road and Santa Clara) the advantages to solving the problem were clear. The ground water of the region is a regional asset, which even Eugene is thinking of using,'and helping improve~the groundwater is important .for residents in Eugene as well as residents in. Coburg.. There are many residents of Eugene who work in Coburg. Protecting their employment, and improving the prospects for more employment .opportunities, is in the best interest ofEugene. One of the concerns expressed during the work session concerned the prospects of growth between the two cities. Coburg shares the Council's concerns that.the presence of wastewater services in Coburg must not become an excuse for growth outside the two urban growth boundaries. There are several ways to prevent this, but from Eugene's perspectiveprobably the best way is to enter into an agreement that gives. Eugene. and MWMC a direct right to control and prevent connections to the wastewater transfer line between Coburg and MWMC. One important question raised during your work session concerned the comparative environmental effects of the different points of discharge for Coburg's wastewater. Coburg's engineers developing Coburg's options for wastewater treatment have looked at these issues closely and, wonting with the DEQ, they have developed some important conclusions. Of Course; Coburg's current discharge is into the groundwater. This is a situation that nearly everyone agrees should be resolved as quickly as possible. From the perspective of the Willamette River downstream of the MWMC discharge, there would be little environmental difference among Coburg's treatment options. If Coburg does not connect to the MWMC system, the same discharge, treated to the same extent, will likely flow down the McKenzie to the confluence with the Willamette. If Eugene chooses to delay~the answer to. Coburg's request the. environmental consequences will be that instead of mixing with the MWMC discharge at the MWMC treatment facility, Coburg's discharge will mix with the MWMC discharge at the confluence of the Willamette and the McKenzie, after flowing approximately four miles down the McKenzie. Coburg prefers the outcome that preserves the McKenzie. . Coburg has been involved in discussions about connecting to.MWMC for years. If Coburg had. the luxury, perhaps it would be easier to accept the staff recommendation that another four