Coburg MWMC - Laserfiche WebLink

New Search

GOVERNANCE: The MWMC Governing Bodies will need to decide the following • Whether current work load and resource constraints provide agency ability to conduct the ground work and decision making processes, and if not, how to address the need and how to determine a time frame for the work • Whether they are agreeable to undertake changes necessary to accommodate Coburg-overall public/political acceptability • Whether Coburg would be served as a "customer" or a "partner," and how accountabilit /re resentation would be rovided for Coburg customers (note: y p p Administration costs for Coburg could vary significantly based on outcome) • Level of accountability, liability Coburg would share in joining MWMC 1VPDES permit and its conditions/requirements • How much ongoing monitoring, reporting, system maintenance/rehabilitation and formal asset management Coburg would be required to commit to in order to maintain long term system integrity and accountability for permit compliance • How would violations and enforcement be handled • Ownership and maintenance of major facilities such as large force mains and pump stations • How to address long-rang community growth implications relative to the Eugene- Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan, and the MWMC partner governing bodies' objectives • How to address/amend existing Metro Plan policies and constraints • How Boundary Commission approval would be sought and by whom, and whether the Boundary Commission would be likely to approval such a request as consistent with the policies of the Metro Plan and state law • The relationship of the Coburg request to other potential extra-territorial extension requests for service (such as the Short Mountain Landfill leachate line, and/or other community requests that might arise out of the Region 2050 planning effort), and whether criteria should be applied determine when MWMC could authorize certain service connections in the future Page 4 _ _ _ _ _