New Search
through leveraging of other projects or funding, are listed at the top of the spreadsheet <br /> and highlighted. The remaining projects are below this and sorted, highest to lowest, by <br /> the number of plus symbols they received by staff members. Projects that are unfunded <br /> are shown on the'Projects for Development" list. To help understand the reasoning <br /> .behind the project ratings, the eleven prioritization factors are further explained in the. <br /> attachment, <br /> We did not show prioritization rankings for the numerous bridge replacement and repair <br /> projects in the proposed CIP. This is due to the fact that bridges are not nominated for <br /> repair or replacement unless they have a significant structural problem. In most of the <br /> cases in Lane County, the bridges that are being listed in the CIP are funded through <br /> OTIA III or HBRR sources. <br /> Project Information Sheets <br /> Attachment 2 to this memo contains more detailed information regarding the projects <br /> considered for inclusion in the draft CIP. These individual projectsheets show an image <br /> of the existing road, provide available data, and describe the problem and proposed <br /> solution. The project sheets also describe the funding category and status of the project, <br /> along with how they are rated based on the eleven prioritization factors. <br /> ATTACHMENTS: <br /> <br /> 'Draft 08-12 CIP Summary Tables <br /> Attachment 1- 08-12 Draft CIP Project Prioritization Matrix <br /> Attachment,2 -Project Information Sheets <br /> 4 <br /> <br />