New Search
ATTACHMENT 2 <br /> Prioritization Matrix <br /> These individual project sheets show an image of the existing road, provide available data, and describe <br /> the problem and proposed solution. The project sheets also describe the funding category and status of <br /> the project, along with how they are rated based on the eleven prioritization factors. <br /> The prioritization factors are. used to compare the relative merit of individual projects. Each factor in <br /> which the proposed project would provide a benefit was marked with a plus or a double-plus <br /> with adouble-plus symbol indicating a strong benefit for that respective factor. These ratings are used to <br /> help identify the highest benefit projects for inclusion in the CIP. <br /> The eleven prioritization factors are defined as follows: <br /> Structural Deficiency Improvement: <br /> This priority rates if the project fixes an existing road or bridge structural problem. The road's Pavement <br /> Condition Index (PCI) can be consulted. Projects that repair road slides, address load posted <br /> roads/bridges, or significantly improve the pavement and driving surface should receive a higher rating. <br /> Bridges are typically not replaced in County projects unless there is a structural deficiency. <br /> Safety Enhancement <br /> In overall terms, improving the safety of the transportation system will result in less accidents and the <br /> elimination of roadside hazards. The number of reported crashes in a 5-year period of time can be <br /> consulted, along with the physical appearance of the roadside. <br /> Road PerformancelCongestion Improvement <br /> Improvements under this priority would address items like peak hour congestion, roadway <br /> alignment/curvature, signal timing and other enhancements that improve overall road performance and <br /> level of service. <br /> BikelPed/Alternative Mode Improvement <br /> This measures a project's inclusion of bicycle lanes, sidewalks, pathways, paved shoulders or L <br /> improvements to the dedicated transit system, balanced with the need/probable use. <br /> Degree of User Benefit <br /> This factor rates the overall cost to public benefit of the project, or "bang for the buck." In general, <br /> projects that are more urban will rate higher because of higher traffic volumes, thus there are more road <br /> users benefiting from the road improvements compared to a typical rural project. <br /> Leverages Other Funds & Proiects <br /> Is there a local, federal, or state match for this project? Does the project also help leverage funding for <br /> another associated project? This factor includes consideration of a wide array of potential benefits and <br /> linkages to proposed projects, such as local funding, bundling a project with other projects, and <br /> <br /> jurisdictional transfer. <br /> Plan Consistency <br /> Is the project included in the Lane County TSP, the EugenelSpringfield TransPlan, State Planning <br /> Documents, or local city TSP's? Does it comply with adopted transportation planning policies? <br /> Economic Development <br /> To what degree does this project specifically promote economic development by supporting local <br /> communities and infrastructure? <br /> _ <br /> <br />