New Search
Message Page 1 of f <br /> RISDAL Lacey L ~ ' <br /> From: WEISS Carolyn J <br /> Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 8:35 AM <br /> To: HOSTICK Robin A; RISDAL Lacey L <br /> Subject: RE: Amazon park funding question ~I <br /> i <br /> Yes, the ballfield lighting one can be closed out. thanks. <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: HOSTICK Robin A I <br /> Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 3:30 PM ~I <br /> <br /> To: RISDAL Lacey L; WEISS Carolyn J <br /> Subject: RE: Amazon park funding question <br /> 1 support closing 975042 and keeping the other one open. I'd just want to make sure there are no conflicts with <br /> grant reporting, etc. Carolyn? ~ <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: RISDAL Lacey L <br /> Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 2:45 PM ~ <br /> To: WEISS Carolyn J; HOSTICK Robin A <br /> Subject: Amazon park funding question ~ <br /> Carolyn 8~ Robin, <br /> I am looking into the Amazon Park funding and saw that we have actually have 2 project numbers open <br /> titled the same. Val thought the 975042 was an old 1997 project that involved ballfield lighting. 1 don't I, <br /> know that for sure. I would like to close out one of these, probably the 975042 since it is the smallest and1l <br /> there has not been any expenditures to this number in FY06. Do you want me to go ahead and <br /> consolidate these accounts or keep both of them open? j <br /> i <br /> 905232 Amazon Park 40,000.00 0.00 40,000.00 I, <br /> 975042 Amazon Park 1,861.00 483.00 1,378.00 <br /> i <br /> i <br /> I <br /> I <br /> i <br /> Lacey Risdal, x4841 <br /> Financial Analyst i <br /> Public I~'orks <br /> Maintenance and Parks & Open Spaces ~ <br /> I~ <br /> I <br /> i <br /> 1/13/2006 <br /> <br />