New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
GJN3890 E-mail 12.29.03
COE
>
PW
>
Admin
>
Finance
>
Capital
>
2008
>
GJN3890 E-mail 12.29.03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2008 7:30:36 PM
Creation date
7/8/2008 9:42:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Capital
PW_Document_Type_Capital
Correspondence
PW_Active
Yes
External_View
No
GJN
003890
GL_Project_Number
905116
Identification_Number
2000025268
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Page 2 of 2 <br /> J Subject: RE: Contract with URS "Lower Amazon LOMR Study" <br /> Cheryl -per an earlier conversation today with Sarah, could you please forward a PO <br /> number to me for this small amount of work for URS. I'm cc'ing Sarah on this request in <br /> case you have any questions for her or for me. <br /> If possible, I'd like to fund it from the budgeted capita! funds (praject number: 905116; GJN: <br /> 3890). <br /> If that is not possible, then I will need to fund it from the WRT professional services budget, in <br /> which case the account code to use is: 535-9370-61800. <br /> Thanks! <br /> j Therese <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: WALCH Therese <br /> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 12:57 PM <br /> To: MADDOX Sarah E <br /> Subject: Contract with URS "Lower Amazon LOMR Study" <br /> Sarah, this contract is expired, I believe, but there are still funds in the project <br /> budget and the work still needs to be completed. As it turns out, we will be hiring <br /> Pacific Water Resources to finish the study, instead of URS. However, we do <br /> need a few hours of URS' time to gather up the deliverables and attend a <br /> meeting to describe the status of their analysis. I'm not expecting the cost of that <br /> to be more than $500 or so. I would like to be able to pay them from the existing <br /> contract if possible, or some other way than establishing another new contract <br /> just so they can close out their original contract. Can you help me find the most <br /> efficient way to do this? <br /> Thanks, <br /> Therese <br /> <br /> j <br /> ~ 2/30/2003 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.