New Search
FEMA Fee-Charge System Administrator <br /> PO Box 22787 <br /> Alexandria,~VA 22304 <br /> I also spoke with Kevin about a proposed response to their Comment #2 regarding paragraph 65.12 and his impression was that it <br /> cc~ probably be presented in a few sentences. What we'll need to do is certify that there are no insurable structures at the <br /> s~ns in question, that the City owns all of the affected land, and that an alternatives analysis has been completed (the Corps <br /> fea~bility study should qualify). I'll draft up a letter to send down to you for Donna Stark to sign. Before I do that, though, I need to <br /> check the row line in one location along the Delta highway. Do you happen to know who I could talk to to find out the offset for the <br /> state highway easement? Someone in your survey branch, maybe? Unfortunately my GIS and CAD layers don't show the <br /> property lines, so either way I'd like to track them down electronically if available. If there's an impact we'd have to send a legal <br /> notice to the state -hopefully that can be avoided, but I'll need to verify their easement line to be sure. I wouldn't worry about <br /> trying to package the payment and additional responses together -they end up in totally different departments anyway. Let me <br /> know if there are any questions. Thanks, <br /> Krey <br /> Krey H. Price, P.E. <br /> Project Engineer <br /> Tetra Tech Inc. <br /> 1020 sw Taylor St., Ste. 530 <br /> Portland, OR 97205 <br /> Tel. (503) 223-5388 Y224 <br /> Fax (503) 228-8631 <br /> krey.price@tetratech.com <br /> www.tetratech.com <br /> From: FINNEY Kevin P [mailto:Kevin.P.FINNEY@ci.eugene.or.us] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 2:39 PM <br /> <br /> To: 'Price, Krey Tt, Inc.' <br /> Cc: MULLEN Lauri H; CAHILL Michelle R <br /> Subject: RE: Two issues: gauge and FEMA, was FW: River gauge at mouth of D ebri ck slough <br /> Thanks for the info Krey. I'll wait to hear from you that the fee will be required. If you hear of a major river elevation event headed <br /> our way, please let me know and we'll put together a posse to go out to read the gauge. Otherwise, we'll stop our regular <br /> readings until further notice. <br /> Kevin <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: Price, Krey Tt, Inc. [mailto:Krey.Price@tetratech.com] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 10:44 AM <br /> To: FINNEY Kevin P <br /> Subject: RE: Two issues: gauge and FEMA, was FW: River gauge at mouth of D ebri ck slough <br /> I wouldn't send anyone down there given the situation. We can make do with what we've got and safety far outweighs the <br /> importance of any data. Sounds like we have quite a few readings already, and I'll get another one this weekend when I'm <br /> down there surveying in the elevations. As long as the river is at a normal stage, we won't need any addtional readings at <br /> this gage. If there were a peak event, it would be good to get that -but again, not worth risking someone's safety. If we see <br /> something is on the way, maybe we could talk about how to safely arrange for getting a reading. Hopefully the weather <br /> patterns and high water corresponding to a peak event would at least temporarily drive out the folks who are camping out <br /> there. We are getting a bit late in the season to expect a major event, so it may not even end up being an issue. It would <br /> also be good to get a low low reading later this summer -we'd need to figure out how to get that when the time comes. That <br /> one probably would have a lot more flexibility as far as the time frame, and I could just plan on getting it some time when <br /> I'm down there anyway. <br /> 3/24/2005 <br /> <br />