New Search
VYhen I spoke to them yesterday she said. that al.l of the checks should. go to Denver. but there are <br /> numerous branch offices and contacts. Our contract will have one address but they may bill from a <br /> ,,,,.different branch office. She stated that most companies are having an issue with the way they <br /> handle the billings etc. <br /> Please update the file with the name info and added address. <br /> Purchasing, <br /> Cancel the I'O and will. recreate a new one to capture the correct address anal vendor name. <br /> ~-,Debbie <br /> From: VINCENT Wayne E <br /> Sint: Monday, December il, 2006 2:16 PM <br /> Tp: CLARK Debbie D <br /> Ck: Eugene Purchasing <br /> Subject: RE: 2007100168 <br /> The invoice is from KCM Inc. (A Tetra Tech Company): <br /> Remit =Dept 1677 Denver CO 80291-1677 <br /> FEIN= 91-0888400 <br /> This is the same as the vendor KCMINC <br /> <br /> ~r?The PO (and the check) is to TETRATECH -different vendor, different address, different FEIN # <br /> The PO (and check) are made out to the wrong vendor. <br /> Ap should cancel the check and a new PO should be issued. Do we have any other info on this that is different? <br /> Thanks! <br /> VWayne <br /> F ,om: CLARK Debbie D <br /> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 7:21 AM <br /> TQ: VINCENT Wayne E <br /> C¢: SHAUGHNESSY Jonna R <br /> Sy~bject: RE: 2007100168 <br /> [ am going to call the vendor this morning. As the agreement I have with them shows a different <br /> address then either of. the ones below. I will. ve:r.:ify where this should be gaing. <br /> Debbie <br /> Friom: VINCENT Wayne E <br /> S$nt: Thursday, December 07, 2006 12:50 PM <br /> Td: CLARK Debbie D <br /> "C: SHAUGHNESSY Jonna R <br /> Subject: RE: 2007100168 <br /> I have not mailed the check - it is not made out to KCM inc and does not have the correct address. Monday fine. <br /> 2 <br /> <br />