New Search
Message Page 1 of 2 <br /> 1 <br /> HAMLIN Peggy D <br /> From: MEDLIN Johnny R <br /> Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 8:48 AM J <br /> To: HAMLIN Peggy D <br /> Cc: TAYLOR Trevor H; DUCKETT Scott __,_.,_,w_ ~ - <br /> _ <br /> Subject: RE: Capital Proj Site Monitoring ~ <br /> ~4; c. <br /> FYI Johnny <br /> ~ ~ ~ <br /> -----Original Message----- ~ ~ <br /> From: DUCKETf Scott ~j" <br /> Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 4:32 PM t <br /> To: MEDLIN Johnny R ~j~ ~ 4 <br /> Cc: TAYLOR Trevor H 1/ <br /> Subject: RE: Capital Proj Site Monitoring <br /> Johnny, <br /> I would prefer to have staff code time to this GJN. For this first project, it would likely only be 20 hours or so a <br /> year, however, if this trend continues, have the flexibility for staff to charge to this GJN would be desirable. We <br /> can use our existing 631 appropriation for this. <br /> Scott <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: HAMLIN Peggy D <br /> Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 7:02 AM <br /> To: MEDLIN Johnny R <br /> Cc: DUCKETT Scott; TAYLOR Trevor H <br /> Subject: RE: Capital Proj Site Monitoring <br /> Hi Johnny, <br /> It is my assumption that you would want to cover staff time required to monitor the <br /> contractors. Let me know if this is true or you plan on having your staff code their time to <br /> operating. <br /> Thanks, <br /> Peggy Hamlin <br /> Financial Analyst <br /> Public Works Administration <br /> 682 5$34 <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: TAYLOR Trevor H <br /> <br /> 4/14/2004 <br /> <br />