New Search
Message Page I of 1 <br /> HAMLIN Peggy D <br /> From: CAHILL Michelle R <br /> Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 2:42 PM <br /> To: GALLUP Steve S; NEIL Richard J <br /> Cc: KLOPE Paul W; SCHOENING Mark A; HAMLIN Peggy D <br /> Subject: RE: Valley River Center WW Rehab <br /> I think it will work to take your $177,OOO,over budget amount for VR WW rehab out of the mother acct WWrehab <br /> utility fund. <br /> This leaves about $59,000 which should cover the only two things I can think of we may need for. (these <br /> being additional funding for community sewer design (maybe), and very likely an additional $ needed for River Rd <br /> outstanding claim - an increase in our IGA to LC) <br /> It looks to me like our main rehab project is fully funded to match our (reduced/revised) estimate and it will bid in <br /> May. Our community sewer work is only funded for design but won't be under construction until next year, so can <br /> iap the FY'05 community sewer budget. We also show a balance in 4009 and I'll talk to Rich about potentially <br /> closing that. <br /> The only outstanding question is that since the project has been funded out of the reimbursement SDC $ is there <br /> a problem using the utility fund? We haven't done any work on the Legacy Extension job that has WW SDC so if <br /> it were somehow more appropriate to use SDC that would be a potential. <br /> me <br /> ----0riglnal Message----- <br /> From: GALLUP Steve S <br /> Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 4:28 PM <br /> To: HQL Richard J; CAHILL Michelle R <br /> Cc: KLOPE Paul W <br /> Subject: Valley River Center WW Rehab <br /> I am in the process of closing out the above subject project and we went over budget due to change orders <br /> and extra engineering psf cost. The outstanding expense is around $177,000. Currently, on my revise <br /> budget summary I am showing this extra expense coming out of wastewater utility funds. Before I submit <br /> this revise budget, I wanted to check on the status of the ww utility fund. Michelle or Rich, let me know If <br /> you foresee a problem with this approach. Thanks. <br /> ~~pr. x(=r ~ y33SZ <br /> 532 9 332 lv/7d.~ Rr~o~s" 182, 522, aU <br /> 532 8332 (o~73S 9S5OrS' ~/8Z, SZz,o~~ <br /> S"3Z 933Z~173sq~Soap ~,8OV,Q~ <br /> 532 X332 1r173s ~ISO7S ~y~~OO,GYJ, <br /> ar32 ~33a ~~73s 9/So7S ~8~sl~.~s~~ ~ ~r~ x~'-,- <br /> 532 /IZ~o ~'/87,sbb.~8 ~ ~~a~~j <br /> 4/2/2004 9~3~ lo173S 9~so75 q2z ~ ~89,5~6.~~ <br /> HAMLIN Peggy D <br /> From: GALLUP Steve S <br /> Sent: Tuesday, April O6, 2004 2:03 PM <br /> To: HAMLIN Peggy D <br /> Subject: Valley River Center As-Built and Warranty Work <br /> fter discussing this with the inspector, we have more Inspection/as-built work than anticipated. I would say a <br /> <br /> budget of 60 hours would be more closer. ,c 80' ~gdp <br /> <br />