New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
GJN4254 PBS 02.24.06
COE
>
PW
>
Admin
>
Finance
>
Capital
>
2008
>
GJN4254 PBS 02.24.06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/8/2010 11:18:36 AM
Creation date
6/23/2008 10:15:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Capital
PW_Document_Type_Capital
Project Budget Summary
PW_Active
No
External_View
No
GJN
004254
GL_Project_Number
955085
Identification_Number
Revised
Retention_Destruction_Date
7/1/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CLARK Debbie D <br /> From: CAHILL Michelle R <br /> $ent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 2:01 PM <br /> To: SCHOENING Mark A <br /> Cc: CLARK Debbie D; PETERSON Tish A; DIXON Valerie A <br /> Subject: Transpo sdcs <br /> You asked me to confirm our project budgets are accounted for and we have money we think we need, especially out of <br /> 333 transpo sdcs. <br /> Judkins Point N <br /> We talked last week and I mentioned it didn't look like a $30k increase in transportation SDCs to Judkins Point North <br /> (4091/ 945034) we requested in January didn't make it to the books that we can see. The budget (need) that we think is <br /> accurate is <br /> $200 k LC grant <br /> $120 k transpo sdc's <br /> Comparing that to the budget summary in project review active or the excel) pivot table trial product it looks like the budget <br /> on the books is $200 k LC and $90 k SDCs. <br /> Bethel Drive Ped path (4101 / 945362) <br /> looks like $40 k requested from transpo SDCs (333) is not showing on the GL, but maybe $17,929 is The full <br /> $135 k is on the active project review but I don't track it on the excel pivot report. We are thinking we are really close to <br /> wrapping up that project and meeting the last estimated budget ($135 k total) that we think looks like this note below <br /> except for $5k more from 333: <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: DAWSON Linda L <br /> Sent: Friday, December 23, 2005 10:42 AM <br /> To: HIGGINS Teri L <br /> Cc: HAGGAS Liesl J; BRIDGES Beth B <br /> Subject: RE: Bethel Path Bid Opening <br /> My understanding is that we collectively have only $130,000 but if you think their use of the <br /> contingency is an acceptable risk, I'd like to accept the full bid. Any charges over the $130 would fall <br /> to PW though. Charge all PDDs expenses both CDBG and neighborhoods to: <br /> 171-9332-6xxxx-945362 <br /> Funding: <br /> 70 - cdbg <br /> 35 - pw <br /> 18 - neighborhoods <br /> 7 -CDBG contingency if needed <br /> 130 -Total <br /> What do I need to do to help resolve these questions. <br /> me <br /> <br /> ~~rr' <br /> 1 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.