New Search
Cc: PERALES Ginger M <br /> ~ Subject: RE: Time Entry Issues <br /> I was not aware of the work type issue for PEPI's. Typically, this would not be an issue. Now to the real issue: This <br /> project will be bid as a CIP. Should we be changing the GJN? <br /> Thanks Peggy. <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: HAMLIN Peggy D <br /> Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 7:47 AM <br /> To: CLARK Debbie D; RAPP Cathy; HIGGINS Teri L <br /> Cc: CASTRO Denise M; CLARK Debbie D; DUDLEY Wayde L; OLSON Kris D; DUNAWAY Mike L <br /> Subject: RE: Time Entry Issues <br /> Your direction on Friday was to change their worktypes to ones that are authorized for PEPI projects. You are to indicate <br /> on the billing invoice that these services are for survey work. That being said, Cathy was going to talk with Teri about the <br /> reasons we would like to go this route. <br /> 1) Work types specific to PEPI make it easier for PWE to check the billing hours being charged out. 2) Work types <br /> specific to PEPI make it so the system kicks out unwanted charges and miscodes. 3) These work types coincide with <br /> the agreements that private developers have signed. This means that they have agreed to pay for design and <br /> inspection. Our system only allows these types of charges. <br /> I feel that we shouldn't start making exceptions to the worktypes. There are so many things to remember as it is, without <br /> more exceptions. The billing will note the difference in work. <br /> Wait to hear back from Cathy and go with what she says. <br /> Thanks, <br /> Peggy Hamlin <br /> Financial Analyst <br /> Public Works Administration <br /> 682 5$34 <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: CLARK Debbie D <br /> Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 7:30 AM <br /> To: HAMLIN Peggy D <br /> Subject: FW: Time Entry Issues <br /> What was the final outcome on this? <br /> -Debbie <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: HIGGINS Teri L <br /> Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 6:49 AM <br /> To: CASTRO Denise M; CLARK Debbie D; DUDLEY Wayde L; OLSON Kris D; DUNAWAY Mike L <br /> Subject: RE: Time Entry Issues <br /> Although not typical for a PEPI, Mike was doing survey work and therefore should use 136. <br /> t. <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: CASTRO Denise M <br /> Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 3:40 PM <br /> To: CLARK Debbie D; DUDLEY Wayde L; OLSON Kris D; DUNAWAY Mike L; HIGGINS Teri L <br /> Subject: RE: Time Entry Issues <br /> Change has been made in time entry and all have been marked as accepted. If there is another change that <br /> needs to happen after Teri has a chance to look at it, we will address it at that time. 121 was used as an interim <br /> solution. Please stop by my desk and initial the change on your timesheets too. <br /> Thanks!! <br /> <br /> 2/14/2005 <br /> <br />