GJN4349 PBS 09.17.06 - Laserfiche WebLink

New Search

E ALLOCATION WORKSHEET Project Name: Greenhill Tributary Path, Sophia Place to Prairie Mountain School Path Project Manager Name: Jenifer Willer (x536a) Service ID # le.g. Good Job Number 004181): 4349 Contract # (e.g. 2004-0505): Capital PlOject # (e.g. 905244): SDC Expenditure Requirements improvement Fees: May be spent only on capital improvements included in an adopted Capital Improvement Plan that Increase capacity needed to provide service for future users, including those that provide new facilities or Increase the capacity provided by existing facilities. Wastewater Eliyible: Nan assessable components ofprojects attributable to future development that drain those portions of pipes within the total area served by the project. (Quantify portions of project that are capacity enhancing; pro-rate design/construction management costs on a proportionate basis. Stormwater EIlgible: Non-assessable components of pipe or open channel projects attributable to future development that drain impervious surface areas within the total drainage basin served by the project. (Quantify portions of project that are capacity enhancing by determining the percent ofproject that will serve new development: The total existing impervious area of basin divided by the future build-out impervious area of basin equals the percent of project serving existing - - - - development. Subtract from 100% to derive the percentage of project that will serve new development. _ - Transportatlon Eligible: Non-assessable components attributable to future development of 1) arterial and collector street projects and related traffic signals, and 2) off-street bicycle path projects. (Quantify portions of project that are capacity enhancing; pro-rate design/construction management costs on a proportionate basis. In the case of major enhancement projects (e.g. Ferry Street Bridge), use analysis to establish the percent of projected trips on the facility that can be attributed to new development between year of construction and build out]. - Parks Eligible: Components of Neighborhood or Community park projects attributable to future development. (Quantify portions of project that are capacity enhancing verses those portions needed to serve existing users. Pro-rate design/construction management costs on a proportionate bans.] _ ' t Plan, including those for new Imbursement F Ilities and rehabii ~ Wastewater Eliyible: Components noted above as well as rehabilitation of existing systems (may also serve existing development). Stormwater Eligible: Components noted above as well as rehabilitation of existing systems (may also serve existing development). Transportation EIlgible: Per Council Resolution No. 4718, reimbursement fees will be budgeted for preservation and maintenance of the existing system (Council or the Budget Committee may subsequently allocate some or all for a different purpose as allowed bylaw). No transportation reimbursement SDC - _ _ revenue is currently attributable to off-street bicycle paths; therefore no reimbursement fee expenditures are allowed for pat s. _ Parks Eligible: No parks SDC revenue is currently attributable to a reimbursement fee; therefore no reimbursement fee expenditures are allowed. Allocation Costs & Percentages of Total Project Costs Bid Phase Final Phase Project Initiation Phase $ Wastewater Improve. Fee $ /0 $ - { _ _ - - _ - _ o~ $ % $ Approved Amounts, if different $ ° % $ Wastewater Reimburse. Fee $ /0 $ % $ Approved Amounts, if different: $ r % $ $ °/a 6?,48.3 64 ~ 87.85% $ - Stormwater hnprove. Fee S - _ - - $ ~ $ Approved Amounts, if different $ % $ % $ ICI Stormwater Reimburse. Fee $ I % $ % Approved Amounts, if different $ % $ $ 5% $ 8 646.28 I~ 12 1 . Fee Trans rtation Improve $ Po - ~ % $ I Approved Amounts, if different $ Transportation Reimburse. Fee $ ~ ° - % % $ Approved Amounts, if different: $ I $ Parks Improve. Fee ~ % $ ---r- Approved Amounts, if different: r n° $ $ N/A % $ NIA I parks Reimburse. Fee $ NIA _ I - $ % $ % Approved Amounts, if different $ Expenditure Allocation Justification Attach documentation that demonstrates justification of SDC funding of this capital project at project initiation phase as well as at time of any subsequent revisions of SDC allocation amounts/percentages. State law requires an annual accounting of SDC expenditures by system at the project level. An SDC expenditure may be legally challenged for up to two years after the expenditure. Approved By: _ _ _ I Date: Date: te: Revised March, 2004 O:\PROJ ECTS\PROJ-9\4349\Design\Budget\20060412_SDCAllocation W rksheet.xls