New Search
Page 2 of 4 <br /> ~1? <br /> To: CARLSON Becky A <br /> • Subject: FUV: funding for Creekside acquisition <br /> <br /> ~r""' fYi <br /> From: SMITH Tammy D <br /> Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 2:19 PM <br /> To: RISDAL Lacey L; CLARK Debbie D <br /> Cc: PETERSON Tish A <br /> Subject: RE: funding for Creekside acquisition <br /> Lacey, <br /> Short recap of our conversation: <br /> This issue has not been resolved and is there a need to correct this 5 years later? <br /> Lacey is going to check with Johnny 8 Carolyn to see if there is a need to correct this transaction (should have <br /> been from Parks SDC and was paid from Park Bond). <br /> Tammy Smith <br /> From: RISDAL Lacey L <br /> Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 12:48 PM <br /> To: SMITH Tammy D; CLARK Debbie D <br /> Subject: FUV: funding for Creekside acquisition <br /> Tammy 8~ Debbie, <br /> What is the next step here? It sounds like we need to do a correction? Do we need to loop Tish or Johnny in that <br /> we are recommending this correction so late in the game? <br /> Lacey Risdal, x4841 <br /> Financial Analyst <br /> Public Works <br /> Maintenance and Parks & Open Spaces ' <br /> From: CLARK Debbie D <br /> Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 8:50 AM <br /> To: ROYER Russ C; HOSTICK Robin A <br /> Cc: RISDAL Lacey L <br /> Subject: RE: <br /> It looks like it was funded out of the Parks Bond for $532k in FYp1, but it was noted that it <br /> should have been Parks SDC (after the fact). I don't see where it was ever corrected. <br /> Debbie <br /> From: ROYER Russ C <br /> 7/27/2006 <br /> <br />