PAF4420 - Laserfiche WebLink

New Search

~ ! ~ ~ CLARK Debbie D From: SCHOENING Mark A Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 3:25 PM ~,To: CLARK Debbie D Subject: RE: MORE: REPLY FROM MARK: Job# 4420 Walnut Station It seems like a small amount for an SB action. Not sure how best to move $12k from Planning to Engineering. How about we use the existing budget authority for 312 and then recognize $12,000 in 312 of the TGM grant that planning receives in the same budget or supplemental budget action? Mark From: CLARK Debbie D Sent: Monday, October 16, 2006 10:35 AM To: SCHOENING Mark A Subject: FW: MORE: REPLY FROM MARK: Job# 4420 Walnut Station Mark, Sorry l am still. bothering yaa a:n fhis but I want to see where we stand. an the funding for this. is your intention tc~ request in SB#1 action far the $12l< intrz fund 31.2 or use existing fund 312 ~I)eFibie From: RAPP Cathy dent: Monday, October 16, 2006 10:27 AM To: CLARK Debbie D Cc: KLOPE Paul W; GALLUP Steve S; SMITH Tammy D; INERFELD Rob; LARSEN Tom C Subject: MORE: REPLY FROM MARK: ]ob# 4420 Walnut Station By the way, Mark also mentioned that Tom Larsen and the Tranp Team staff (Emily, Rob, etc) should charge their time to operating (not the GJN). Cathy From: RAPP Cathy Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 11:09 AM To: CLARK Debbie D Cc: KLOPE Paul W; GALLUP Steve S; SMITH Tammy D Subject: REPLY FROM MARK: Job# 4420 Walnut Station I talked to Mark about this project and he said that it was definitely not operational. The GJN should be used by the PSF- supported staff (basically the project team staff. So, a GJN it is. Cathy From: CLARK Debbie D Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 1:59 PM To: KLOPE Paul W; GALLUP Steve S Cc: SCHOENING Mark A; SMITH Tammy D; RAPP Cathy Subject: FW: Job# 4420 Walnut Station Hello everyone a.nd. happy Thursday! l bel.i.eve a few af. you i~na.y be acct at the Al'`W~ conference ut wanted to get the discussion gazing. 1