AJE61964 - Laserfiche WebLink

New Search

AANDERUD Kris Fromc SMITH Tammy D Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 1:07 PM 'o: CLARK Debbie D; AAN©ERUD Kris ` c: RISDAL Lacey L Subject: FW: 2 GJN changes and AJE's needed for 321 Debbie and Kris, If you have time next week to process the journals it would be great, but it can wait till I come back. Please change the job cost system to point to the correct fund. Thank you, Tammy From: RISDAL Lacey L Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 1:04 PM To: SMITH Tammy D Subject: 2 GlN changes and AlE's needed for 321 Tammy, In reviewing the 321 fund, I think there are a couple GJN's that need switched to the new bond fund 324, and not charging " to 321. We also need to an AJE done to move the charges that are showing up in 321 to 324. ~1~ 1) Project 905242-Ridgeline Expansion Planning. The GJN for this project should be moved to fund 324, and all the PSF charges for this FY should be moved to fund 324 (from 321). Also, there were charges that hit the 321 fund in FY07 (mostly PSF) that should have been to 324. Can you also include these FY07 expenses in your AJE? These FY07 expenses caused a negative appropriation to roll forward into FY08. I'd like to clear this negative appropriation up, and I realize I may have to wait until roll-over, and just not roll the negative amount. 1'd like your advice on how you want me to address this particular part of the account. 2) Project 915142 -Parkland Acquisition Planning. The GJN for this project should be moved to fund 324, and all PSF charges for this FY should eke moved to fund- 324 (from 321). As with the previous project, there are some ~~ PSF charges in FY07 in 321 that should be moved to 324. These PSF charges are all those that occurred after the passage of the bond, so after Nov 7, 2006. There will be some PSF charges that occurred prior to the passage of the bond that should stay in 321. Thanks! Lacey Risdal, x4841 Financial Analyst Public Works Maintenance and Parks & Open Spaces 1