CITY OF EUGENE <br /> INTER-DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM <br /> CITY ATTORNEY— CIVIL DEPARTMENT <br /> To: Dick Gassman Date: March 17, 1999 <br /> PDD-PIC <br /> Subject: Search Guidelines for City Inspectors <br /> You have asked us to provide you with guidance regarding limitations upon City inspectors' <br /> ability to inspect private property for purposes of nuisance detection and abatement. First, in this <br /> memorandum we discuss the protection against unreasonable searches and seizure provided by the <br /> Fourth Amendment of the US Constitution and Article 1,section 9 of the Oregon Constitution. We <br /> focus upon the concept of "curtilage,"which is the area outside a dwelling in which the residents <br /> have a constitutionally protected privacy interest. Next, we describe general limitations upon <br /> inspectors which are present in a variety of situations. Finally,we provide some rules to guide your <br /> development of policy for inspectors in the field. <br /> If an inspection or abatement rises to the level of a "search" under the state or federal <br /> constitutions, the inspector must obtain either a search warrant or consent of the property holder <br /> prior to that inspection or abatement.' A warrantless search may subject the City and the inspector <br /> to liability for money damages for violation of the property holder's constitutional rights. A search <br /> occurs when the government infringes on an individual's reasonable expectation of privacy. In <br /> making a determination of whether his action will be a search, an inspector must consider whether <br /> an individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy in a particular area and then whether his <br /> action will infringe upon that expectation. <br /> Reasonable Expectation of Privacy <br /> A person has a reasonable expectation of privacy in the following areas: 1)his dwelling; 2) <br /> the curtilage of his dwelling; and 3) outside the curtilage if he manifests an intent to exclude the <br /> public by erecting barriers,such as fences or signs. Entry upon any of those areas requires a warrant <br /> or permission. However, it is generally allowable to observe those areas from a vantage point <br /> available to the public or from private property which an inspector has permission to be upon, as <br /> long as he does not have to resort to extraordinary efforts to see the area. (See discussion below). <br /> 'If exigent circumstances are present,a search may be conducted without a warrant. Exigent circumstances <br /> exist where there is a danger that evidence of a crime will be destroyed or an individual would be harmed if the inspector <br /> did not enter the property immediately. Because we believe that this would be an extremely rare occurrence with <br /> nuisance abatement,we will not discuss this exception to the warrant requirement in this memorandum. In addition, <br /> we also note that Eugene Code 6.090(2)does not confer upon city personnel the authority to enter property without a <br /> warrant when such entry otherwise would require a warrant. <br />