New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Search Guidelines - Stormwater
COE
>
PW
>
POS_PWM
>
Parks
>
Stormwater
>
Search Guidelines - Stormwater
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/11/2015 11:37:22 AM
Creation date
9/11/2015 11:37:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Operating
PW_Document_Type_ Operating
Correspondence
Fiscal_Year
2016
PW_Division
Parks and Open Space
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITY OF EUGENE <br /> INTER-DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM <br /> CITY ATTORNEY— CIVIL DEPARTMENT <br /> To: Dick Gassman Date: March 17, 1999 <br /> PDD-PIC <br /> Subject: Search Guidelines for City Inspectors <br /> You have asked us to provide you with guidance regarding limitations upon City inspectors' <br /> ability to inspect private property for purposes of nuisance detection and abatement. First, in this <br /> memorandum we discuss the protection against unreasonable searches and seizure provided by the <br /> Fourth Amendment of the US Constitution and Article 1,section 9 of the Oregon Constitution. We <br /> focus upon the concept of "curtilage,"which is the area outside a dwelling in which the residents <br /> have a constitutionally protected privacy interest. Next, we describe general limitations upon <br /> inspectors which are present in a variety of situations. Finally,we provide some rules to guide your <br /> development of policy for inspectors in the field. <br /> If an inspection or abatement rises to the level of a "search" under the state or federal <br /> constitutions, the inspector must obtain either a search warrant or consent of the property holder <br /> prior to that inspection or abatement.' A warrantless search may subject the City and the inspector <br /> to liability for money damages for violation of the property holder's constitutional rights. A search <br /> occurs when the government infringes on an individual's reasonable expectation of privacy. In <br /> making a determination of whether his action will be a search, an inspector must consider whether <br /> an individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy in a particular area and then whether his <br /> action will infringe upon that expectation. <br /> Reasonable Expectation of Privacy <br /> A person has a reasonable expectation of privacy in the following areas: 1)his dwelling; 2) <br /> the curtilage of his dwelling; and 3) outside the curtilage if he manifests an intent to exclude the <br /> public by erecting barriers,such as fences or signs. Entry upon any of those areas requires a warrant <br /> or permission. However, it is generally allowable to observe those areas from a vantage point <br /> available to the public or from private property which an inspector has permission to be upon, as <br /> long as he does not have to resort to extraordinary efforts to see the area. (See discussion below). <br /> 'If exigent circumstances are present,a search may be conducted without a warrant. Exigent circumstances <br /> exist where there is a danger that evidence of a crime will be destroyed or an individual would be harmed if the inspector <br /> did not enter the property immediately. Because we believe that this would be an extremely rare occurrence with <br /> nuisance abatement,we will not discuss this exception to the warrant requirement in this memorandum. In addition, <br /> we also note that Eugene Code 6.090(2)does not confer upon city personnel the authority to enter property without a <br /> warrant when such entry otherwise would require a warrant. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.