New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Amazon Channel - Storm Sewer
COE
>
PW
>
POS_PWM
>
Parks
>
Stormwater
>
Amazon Channel - Storm Sewer
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/11/2015 11:12:53 AM
Creation date
9/11/2015 11:12:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Operating
PW_Document_Type_ Operating
Correspondence
Fiscal_Year
2016
PW_Division
Parks and Open Space
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
178
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Considera tion of Task Force' s Estimate <br /> The Emerald Canal Feasibility Task Force' s final report estimated the <br /> Emerald Canal costs as $22,103,000 for aarrecreational channel adapted�to <br /> handle flood flows from Amazon Creek. This estimate includes costs that were <br /> not considered in the technical appendix estimate for the diversion channel. <br /> Additional costs included were for diversion of flow from the Willamette River <br /> to the millrace, for modifications to Amazon Creek, for park and recreation <br /> facilities, and for relocation of utilities. <br /> Using the Task Force' s estimate for lands and damages and for relocations <br /> of utilities as a starting point, a cost of $26,921,000 was developed for the <br /> diversion channel from Amazon Creek to the Willamette River. Of this amount, <br /> $12,000,000 is for lands and damages and $7,000,000 is for relocation of <br /> utilities. To amortize the total of $19,000,000 for these two costs would <br /> take $1,616,000 per year. <br /> With average annual flood control benefits of $373,000 per year the <br /> benefit-to-cost ratio is 0.23 with construction cost omitted. Including <br /> construction costs would produce a benefit-to-cost ration to 0.16. <br /> Because the origin of portions of the Task Force's estimate was unavail- <br /> able, no attempt was made to revise the technical appendix estimate to include <br /> utilities relocation or revised lands and damages costs. Also, without these <br /> costs, the benefit-to-cost ratio was considerably below unity. <br /> CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> Conclusions <br /> As a result of this reconnaissance study, the following conclusions can be <br /> drawn: <br /> 100-year flood event for Amazon Creek is equivalent to 2,300 cfs of <br /> IIflow at the downstream end of the existing concrete-lined channel in the <br /> creek. <br /> 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.