New Search
Nancy Nathanson <br /> - Ditto on the billing and financial management piece. Look for new ways <br /> to do this. <br /> - This program is a good candidate for a performance audit. <br /> - Part of this is how fast you move toward goals. Do we need to look at <br /> NPDES permit and renegotiate how much we do and how fast? <br /> - Is there anything you recommend could be delayed or could you pick out <br /> the parts with the greatest benefit vs. cost? <br /> Bonnie Bettman <br /> - I echo the concerns regarding billing. <br /> - Look at policy. Certain things have been put into the bucket that may be <br /> able to be taken out, for example street sweeping could be a <br /> maintenance expense, not necessarily stormwater. <br /> - Land use permitting over a half million in costs. Increase fees? <br />• Jennifer Solomon <br /> - The program started in 1993 and the City is still planning a lot. There is <br /> open waterways planning on one page and then operations and <br /> maintenance on another. Basin planning — have you been spending <br /> $600 million every year since 1993? <br /> Betty Taylor <br /> - Concerned about the cost of administration. <br /> - Would like to know how the stream corridor acquisition is going. <br /> Mayor Torrey <br /> - Concerned about our ability to provide credibility to the public. We <br /> shouldn't be afraid to say "this is what we did, this is what Planning <br /> means." <br /> - Compare what it would cost us to bill vs. a private billing agency. <br /> - As long as the option of lowering the stormwater fee is out there, we <br /> can't resolve the transportation utility fee. <br /> I <br />